Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Fielding Yost vs Percy Haughton
Fielding Yost: 84th pct vs Percy Haughton: 83rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Fielding YostPercy Haughton
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Fielding Yost vs Percy Haughton
Fielding Yost: 100th pct vs Percy Haughton: 98th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Fielding Yost vs Percy Haughton
Fielding Yost: 12th pct vs Percy Haughton: 9th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Fielding Yost vs Percy Haughton
Fielding Yost: 0 titles vs Percy Haughton: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Fielding Yost vs Percy Haughton
Fielding Yost: 26 seasons vs Percy Haughton: 26 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Fielding Yost
Fielding Yost: 83.3% vs Percy Haughton: 81.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Fielding Yost
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Percy Haughton
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Fielding YostPercy Haughton
EliteStrongAverageLean
Percy Haughton: 1908 HarvardPercy Haughton: 1923 Columbia
1899Actual season year • SRS range -4.0 to 41.11926
Active comparison point
Fielding Yost • 1905
1905 Michigan
Best season12-1 • SRS 41.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
92.3%
YoY SRS
+17.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Percy Haughton
Nearest year 1908 • Harvard
9-0-1 • SRS 23.9 • SP Overall —
Fielding Yost holds a 17.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fielding Yost | |||||
| Michigan | 1901-1926 | 25 | 165-29-10 | 19.1 | 41.1Highest peak |
| Percy Haughton | |||||
| Cornell | 1899-1900 | 2 | 17-5 | 6.8 | 10.1 |
| Harvard | 1908-1916 | 9 | 71-7-5 | 25.5Best quality | 33.4 |
| Columbia | 1923-1924 | 2 | 9-7-2 | 0.8 | 5.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Fielding Yost
165-29-10 • 83.3% • 25 seasons • 0 titles
-0.4 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Michigan 1905
SRS 41.1
Worst Season
Michigan 1908
SRS -0.4
Biggest Improvement
Michigan 1913
33.2 SRS
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Percy Haughton
97-19-7 • 81.7% • 13 seasons • 0 titles
3 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Harvard 1913
SRS 33.4
Worst Season
Columbia 1923
SRS -4.0
Biggest Improvement
Harvard 1908
20.3 SRS