Columbia
1923-1924 • 9-7-2
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
Avg SRS 0.8Win % 55.6%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.
← Back to Coaches
Peak DominatorBalancedLong Career
Percy Haughton
1899-1924 • Columbia, Cornell, Harvard
3 schools coached, anchored by Harvard.
Percy Haughton coached 13 seasons, won 81.7%, and posted an average SRS of 18.9. Best season: 1913 Harvard. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 3 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
97-19-7
Career Win %
81.7%
Seasons
13
Career Span
26 years
Average SRS
18.9
Peak SRS
33.4
Best Finish
—
Consistency
9.1
Higher = steadier
Career Arc
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Percy Haughton
EliteStrongAverageLean
Percy Haughton: 1908 HarvardPercy Haughton: 1923 Columbia
1899Actual season year • SRS range -4.0 to 33.41924
Active comparison point
Percy Haughton • 1913
1913 Harvard
Best season9-0 • SRS 33.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+6.9
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
School Tenures
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure
Columbia
1923-1924 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 0.8 • Win % 55.6%
Harvard
1908-1916 • 9 seasons
Avg SRS 25.5 • Win % 88.5%
Cornell
1899-1900 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 6.8 • Win % 77.3%
Longest Tenure
Harvard • 9 seasons
Best Tenure
Harvard • 25.5 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Harvard • 88.5%
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Percy Haughton
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Impact by School
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
Harvard
1908-1916 • 71-7-5
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
Avg SRS 25.5Win % 88.5%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.
Cornell
1899-1900 • 17-5
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (3 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS 6.8Win % 77.3%
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.5 during vs 6.7 baseline
+1.8
Avg SRS
Higher is better
6.8 during vs 14.4 baseline
-7.6
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
Career Highs and Lows
High Points
Best Season
Harvard 1913
9-0 • SRS 33.4
Biggest Improvement
Harvard 1908
9-0-1 • 20.3 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Columbia 1923
4-4-1 • SRS -4.0
Biggest Drop
Columbia 1923
4-4-1 • -25.1 SRS
Season-by-Season Results
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Columbia | 1924 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 61.1% | — | — | 5.6 | — | — | — | +9.6 | +11.1% |
| Columbia | 1923 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% | — | — | -4.0 | — | — | — | -25.1 | -20.0% |
| Harvard | 1916 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% | — | — | 21.1 | — | — | — | -6.5 | -18.9% |
| Harvard | 1915 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 27.6 | — | — | — | +0.6 | 0.0% |
| Harvard | 1914 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 88.9% | — | — | 27.0 | — | — | — | -6.4 | -11.1% |
| Harvard | 1913 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 33.4 | — | — | — | +6.9 | 0.0% |
| Harvard | 1912 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 26.5 | — | — | — | +4.0 | +27.8% |
| Harvard | 1911 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 72.2% | — | — | 22.5 | — | — | — | -3.5 | -22.2% |
| Harvard | 1910 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 94.4% | — | — | 26.0 | — | — | — | +4.1 | +5.6% |
| Harvard | 1909 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 21.9 | — | — | — | -2.0 | -6.1% |
| Harvard | 1908 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 95.0% | — | — | 23.9 | — | — | — | +20.3 | +11.7% |
| Cornell | 1900 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | — | — | 3.6 | — | — | — | -6.5 | +13.3% |
| Cornell | 1899 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% | — | — | 10.1 | — | — | — | — | — |
Similar Coaches
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
Fielding Yost
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 19.1 • Peak SRS 41.1 • 25 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 10.3
Open profile →Bo Schembechler
same balanced identity • volatility within 0.8
Avg SRS 16.8 • Peak SRS 32.9 • 27 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 10.0
Open profile →Woody Hayes
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 18.9 • Peak SRS 36.3 • 28 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 8.2
Open profile →Henry Williams
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS 20.0 • Peak SRS 42.5 • 23 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 10.5
Open profile →John Vaught
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.6
Avg SRS 18.2 • Peak SRS 34.2 • 25 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →Darrell Royal
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 18.9 • Peak SRS 35.4 • 23 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 7.8
Open profile →