1901-1926 • Michigan
One defining stop at Michigan.
Fielding Yost coached 25 seasons, won 83.3%, and posted an average SRS of 19.1. Best season: 1905 Michigan. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
165-29-10
Career Win %
83.3%
Seasons
25
Career Span
26 years
Average SRS
19.1
Peak SRS
41.1
Best Finish
—
Consistency
12.1
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
12-1 • SRS 41.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
92.3%
YoY SRS
+17.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Michigan
1901-1926 • 25 seasons
Avg SRS 19.1 • Win % 83.3%
Longest Tenure
Michigan • 25 seasons
Best Tenure
Michigan • 19.1 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Michigan • 83.3%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Fielding Yost
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
1901-1926 • 165-29-10
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.6 during vs 8.0 baseline
-1.4
Avg SRS
Higher is better
19.1 during vs 0.1 baseline
+19.0
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Michigan 1905
12-1 • SRS 41.1
Biggest Improvement
Michigan 1913
6-1 • 33.2 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Michigan 1908
5-2-1 • SRS -0.4
Biggest Drop
Michigan 1906
4-1 • -28.8 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Michigan | 1926 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% | — | — | 23.8 | — | — | — | -5.2 | 0.0% |
| Michigan | 1925 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% | — | — | 29.0 | — | — | — | +9.2 | -12.5% |
| Michigan | 1923 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 19.8 | — | — | — | -2.9 | +7.1% |
| Michigan | 1922 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 92.9% | — | — | 22.7 | — | — | — | -3.9 | +14.3% |
| Michigan | 1921 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 78.6% | — | — | 26.6 | — | — | — | +10.1 | +7.1% |
| Michigan | 1920 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% | — | — | 16.5 | — | — | — | +13.4 | +28.6% |
| Michigan | 1919 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% | — | — | 3.1 | — | — | — | — | -57.1% |
| Michigan | 1918 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +20.0% |
| Michigan | 1917 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | 18.9 | — | — | — | +11.3 | +2.2% |
| Michigan | 1916 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% | — | — | 7.6 | — | — | — | -2.1 | +21.5% |
| Michigan | 1915 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 56.3% | — | — | 9.7 | — | — | — | -4.7 | -10.4% |
| Michigan | 1914 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% | — | — | 14.4 | — | — | — | -19.2 | -19.1% |
| Michigan | 1913 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% | — | — | 33.6 | — | — | — | +33.2 | +14.3% |
| Michigan | 1912 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% | — | — | 0.4 | — | — | — | -11.2 | -3.6% |
| Michigan | 1911 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 75.0% | — | — | 11.6 | — | — | — | -14.5 | 0.0% |
| Michigan | 1910 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 75.0% | — | — | 26.1 | — | — | — | -4.6 | -10.7% |
| Michigan | 1909 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% | — | — | 30.7 | — | — | — | +31.1 | +17.0% |
| Michigan | 1908 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 68.8% | — | — | -0.4 | — | — | — | -18.0 | -14.6% |
| Michigan | 1907 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% | — | — | 17.6 | — | — | — | +5.3 | +3.3% |
| Michigan | 1906 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | 12.3 | — | — | — | -28.8 | -12.3% |
| Michigan | 1905 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% | — | — | 41.1 | — | — | — | +17.4 | -7.7% |
| Michigan | 1904 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 23.7 | — | — | — | -1.9 | +4.2% |
| Michigan | 1903 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 95.8% | — | — | 25.6 | — | — | — | -0.8 | -4.2% |
| Michigan | 1902 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 26.4 | — | — | — | +9.8 | 0.0% |
| Michigan | 1901 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 16.6 | — | — | — | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 18.9 • Peak SRS 33.4 • 13 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 10.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.3
Avg SRS 16.8 • Peak SRS 32.9 • 27 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 10.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 18.9 • Peak SRS 36.3 • 28 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 8.2
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.9
Avg SRS 20.0 • Peak SRS 42.5 • 23 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 10.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 18.9 • Peak SRS 35.4 • 23 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 7.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 18.2 • Peak SRS 34.2 • 25 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →