Coaches Research Hub

Explore college football coaches by peak, consistency, and identity.

Turn coach-season records into career arcs, school-by-school tenures, style profiles, and side-by-side comparisons.

Browse coachesCompare coaches

Peak finder

Jump from the broad landscape to the highest single-season ceilings.

Tenure story

See where coaches built, inherited, or stabilized a program.

Compare mode

Stack up to four coaches on the same profile and arc surfaces.

Current Research Window

These totals update with every filter so the discovery visuals and the table below stay on the same coach universe. Start from the recommended sample, then tighten the field around identity, school, time span, or quality.

3+ seasons

1271

Coaches in view

1786 indexed coaches available

11703

Coach-seasons

12402 total coach-season rows

45/51

Page position

1271 coaches in the current filtered result set

Summary and Filtering

Filter and rank coaches

Coach search stays primary, then school, archetype, time span, and quality sharpen the list. The recommended starting point is 3+ seasons.

Reset to recommendedClear all

Recommended baseline

Keep at least 3 seasons in view to avoid tiny-sample profiles dominating the charts and leaderboards.

Coach Identity

The fastest way to narrow style and school context.

Time and Sample

Keep the result set stable before reading the charts.

Recommended: 3+ seasons.

Quality

Shortcut the list toward stronger resumes and stronger finishes.

These filters reshape the charts and the results table together, so every leaderboard and callout below reflects the same active set.

You are on the recommended baseline view.

Primary Discovery

One clear lens at a time.

Start with career shape or flip to identity. Either way, the chart, the coach summary, the outlier list, and the table context all stay synchronized.

Success vs Volatility

Start with the simplest question: who paired real strength with a repeatable week-to-week shape?

250 coaches shown
Elite and steady
Elite but volatile
Lower ceiling but stable
Lower ceiling and unstable

Mike Knoll

Volatility: 4.22 • Average SRS: -30.12

9.1% win rate • -25.6 peak SRS

Volatility
Average SRS

Hover or focus a point to isolate it. Click a coach to carry that selection into the results table.

Average SRS reads overall strength. Volatility is the spread of season-to-season SRS, so lower values mean a steadier profile.

Career shape lens

Mike Knoll

This is the clearest first-pass view for peak versus stability. It is the best place to start browsing.

BalancedBalanced

Mike Knoll is currently highlighted in the success vs volatility view.

Volatility
4.22
Average SRS
-30.12
Career Win %
9.1%
Peak SRS
-25.6
View coach profile

Active chart outliers

These callouts update with the active discovery mode and filtered coach set.

4 markers

  1. Highest peak

    John Corbett

    Single-season ceiling leader in the current filtered set.

    17.1 peak SRS

  2. Most consistent elite coach

    Craig Fertig

    High average strength without the season-to-season swing.

    -5.12 avg SRS • 4.96 volatility

  3. Steadiest floor

    Mike Sanford Jr

    Lowest volatility in the view. Lower is more stable.

    0.21 volatility

  4. Elite but volatile

    Todd Monken

    Big ceiling, but the weekly shape moved around more than the steady tier.

    12.13 volatility

Top Career Peaks

Keep the ceiling board in view, but as a support module for the active lens, not the main destination.

  1. 1. Harry Hughes

    1916

    46.5

  2. 2. Red Blaik

    1945

    44.1

  3. 3. Nelson Norgren

    1916

    44.0

  4. 4. Henry Williams

    1905

    42.5

  5. 5. Amos Alonzo Stagg

    1905

    42.2

Elite and steady

Upper-left is the premium zone: strong average results without much season-to-season swing.

Elite but volatile

Upper-right still reaches major heights, but the shape was less repeatable.

Lower ceiling but stable

Lower-left profiles stayed steady even if the absolute ceiling never reached the very top tier.

Lower ceiling and unstable

Lower-right is where the career shape had neither a high average peak nor reliable steadiness.

Supporting Insights

Quick leaderboards, grouped on purpose.

These are shortcuts into the same table below. Performance leads the stack, while stability and longevity stay visible without competing with the main chart.

Performance

Primary leaderboard shortcuts

The fastest path into peak and results leaders.

3 boards

Highest Peak SRS

Single-season ceiling leaders.

View

  1. 1. Harry Hughes

    1916 Colorado State (6-0-1)

    46.5

  2. 2. Red Blaik

    1945 Army (9-0)

    44.1

  3. 3. Nelson Norgren

    1916 Utah (3-2)

    44.0

  4. 4. Henry Williams

    1905 Minnesota (10-1)

    42.5

  5. 5. Amos Alonzo Stagg

    1905 Chicago (11-0)

    42.2

Best Career Win %

Who won the most across a meaningful sample.

View

  1. 1. Walter Camp

    5 seasons

    97.1%

  2. 2. Knute Rockne

    1924 Notre Dame (10-0)

    88.1%

  3. 3. Ryan Day

    2019 Ohio State (13-1)

    87.5%

  4. 4. Frank Leahy

    1946 Notre Dame (8-0-1)

    86.4%

  5. 5. Jesse Harper

    1913 Notre Dame (7-0)

    86.3%

Most Top 10 Finishes

Coaches who stacked elite endings.

View

  1. 1. Bear Bryant

    1971 Alabama (11-1)

    22

  2. 2. Joe Paterno

    1994 Penn State (12-0)

    22

  3. 3. Tom Osborne

    1995 Nebraska (12-0)

    18

  4. 4. Nick Saban

    2016 Alabama (14-1)

    18

  5. 5. Bo Schembechler

    1973 Michigan (10-0-1)

    16

Stability

Stability shortcuts

Who stays in control year after year.

1 board

Most Consistent

Low-volatility coaches with enough sample.

View

  1. 1. Parke Davis

    1897 Lafayette (9-2-1)

    0.0

  2. 2. DM Balliet

    1901 Purdue (4-4-1)

    0.0

  3. 3. Mike Sanford Jr

    2022 Colorado (1-6)

    0.2

  4. 4. Henry Shenk

    1943 Kansas (4-5-1)

    0.5

  5. 5. Jerry Baldwin

    2001 Louisiana (3-8)

    0.5

Longevity

Longevity shortcuts

Long arcs, big samples, and durable careers.

1 board

Longest Careers

Big careers and long arcs.

View

  1. 1. John Anderson

    1976 Brown (8-1)

    64 years

  2. 2. Paul Davis

    1963 Mississippi State (7-2-2)

    59 years

  3. 3. Amos Alonzo Stagg

    1905 Chicago (11-0)

    53 years

  4. 4. George Barclay

    1951 Washington and Lee (6-4)

    48 years

  5. 5. Joe Paterno

    1994 Penn State (12-0)

    46 years

Results Table

Coach results table

1271 filtered coaches in view. Lower rank numbers are better. Lower volatility means more stable. Lower SP Def numbers are better on the identity chart.

Compare selected (0)
1271 filtered coachesSuccess vs Volatility activeSorted by Identity ascending
Compare
Lloyd Eaton

57-33-2 • 1962-1970

Wyoming
992573363.0%5.5
23.4

1966 peak

11.017.533.3#61
Defense-First

Peak Dominator

Bill Walsh

34-24-1 • 1977-1994

Stanford
559342458.5%9.6
18.1

1978 peak

7.035.826.2#91
Offense-First

Longevity Coach

Emory Bellard

85-69 • 1972-1985

Mississippi State, Texas A&M
14154856955.2%10.4
21.5

1976 peak

6.029.020.1#71
Defense-First

Peak Dominator

Foge Fazio

25-18-3 • 1982-1985

Pittsburgh
446251857.6%9.7
20.0

1982 peak

7.626.617.4#101
Defense-First

Defense-First

Dutch Meyer

109-79-13 • 1934-1952

TCU
192011097957.5%8.7
23.6

1935 peak

8.1——#11
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Ray Perkins

34-24-1 • 1983-1992

Alabama, Arkansas State
559342458.5%8.0
20.8

1986 peak

17.930.820.1#02
Defense-First

Peak Dominator

Mike Norvell

71-43 • 2016-2025

Florida State, Memphis
10114714362.3%7.7
19.6

2023 peak

7.533.124.5#61
Offense-First

Longevity Coach

George Sauer

56-37-8 • 1946-1955

Baylor, Kansas +1
10101563759.4%9.2
19.5

1951 peak

6.4——#91
Balanced

Longevity Coach

Spencer Danielson

15-3 • 2023-2025

Boise State
31815383.3%6.9
9.9

2024 peak

2.332.425.8#81
Offense-First

Consistent Winner

Mike Archer

27-18-1 • 1987-1990

LSU
446271859.8%9.1
20.0

1987 peak

8.731.620.2#51
Balanced

—

Jack Meagher

84-64-10 • 1929-1944

Auburn, Iowa Pre-Flight +1
15158846456.3%8.7
29.3

1944 peak

8.8——#61
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Rick Neuheisel

87-58 • 1995-2011

Colorado, UCLA +1
12145875860.0%7.7
20.0

1995 peak

7.835.024.8#33
Offense-First

Longevity Coach

Buck Shaw

52-22-7 • 1937-1957

Air Force, California +1
981522268.5%5.9
16.1

1940 peak

11.0——#03
Balanced

Longevity Coach

Andy Smith

86-22-10 • 1913-1925

California, Purdue
13118862277.1%14.6
35.1

1920 peak

14.2———0
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Pop Warner

311-103-32 • 1897-1938

Carlisle, Cornell +3
4244631110373.3%16.3
41.4

1916 peak

10.4———0
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Darryl Rogers

109-62-7 • 1969-1984

Arizona State, Fresno State +2
161781096263.2%6.9
21.8

1978 peak

9.230.722.3#61
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Murray Warmath

97-84-10 • 1952-1971

Minnesota, Mississippi State
20191978453.4%10.5
22.9

1960 peak

6.625.827.1#13
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Sam Willaman

40-25-8 • 1922-1933

Iowa State, Ohio State
973402560.3%9.0
15.8

1930 peak

5.6——#05
Balanced

Program Stabilizer

Bobby Collins

89-46-3 • 1975-1986

SMU, Southern Miss
12138894665.6%7.3
16.6

1981 peak

6.129.218.2#22
Defense-First

Longevity Coach

Edwin Price

33-27-1 • 1951-1956

Texas
661332754.9%12.7
21.0

1952 peak

7.5——#101
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Tommy Bowden

90-49 • 1997-2008

Clemson, Tulane
12139904964.8%9.8
14.6

2007 peak

3.735.123.7#71
Offense-First

Consistent Winner

Fred Akers

108-75-3 • 1975-1990

Purdue, Texas +1
161861087558.9%6.7
26.1

1977 peak

11.927.921.9#24
Defense-First

Peak Dominator

Bump Elliott

51-42-2 • 1959-1968

Michigan
1095514254.7%11.5
24.8

1964 peak

8.1——#41
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Milt Bruhn

52-45-6 • 1956-1966

Wisconsin
11103524553.4%9.9
29.6

1962 peak

10.9——#23
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Red Dawson

45-30-5 • 1936-1954

Pittsburgh, Tulane
980453059.4%9.9
20.9

1939 peak

5.4——#51
Balanced

Peak Dominator

Showing 1101-1125 of 1271

4344454647

About This Data

How to read the page

Filtered state

Every number, chart callout, and leaderboard on this page reflects the current filter state, not the full indexed universe.

Metric framing

Lower volatility means more stable. Lower finish rank numbers are better. On identity, lower SP Def numbers indicate stronger defense.

Research flow

Use the active chart to form a hypothesis, then drop into the table to sort, compare, and export the exact slice you are studying.