1897-1938 • Carlisle, Cornell, Pittsburgh, Stanford, Temple
5 schools coached, anchored by Carlisle.
Pop Warner coached 42 seasons, won 73.3%, and posted an average SRS of 16.3. Best season: 1916 Pittsburgh. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 5 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
311-103-32
Career Win %
73.3%
Seasons
42
Career Span
42 years
Average SRS
16.3
Peak SRS
41.4
Best Finish
—
Consistency
11.6
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
8-0 • SRS 41.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+10.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Temple
1933-1938 • 6 seasons
Avg SRS 5.8 • Win % 61.2%
Stanford
1924-1932 • 9 seasons
Avg SRS 19.7 • Win % 78.1%
Pittsburgh
1915-1923 • 9 seasons
Avg SRS 25.9 • Win % 81.6%
Carlisle
1899-1914 • 13 seasons
Avg SRS 14.5 • Win % 71.3%
Cornell
1897-1906 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS 12.0 • Win % 72.1%
Longest Tenure
Carlisle • 13 seasons
Best Tenure
Pittsburgh • 25.9 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Pittsburgh • 81.6%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Pop Warner
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
1933-1938 • 31-18-9
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (3 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.2 during vs 6.7 baseline
-1.5
Avg SRS
Higher is better
5.8 during vs 0.4 baseline
+5.4
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1924-1932 • 71-17-8
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.9 during vs 4.6 baseline
+3.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
19.7 during vs 8.5 baseline
+11.2
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1915-1923 • 60-12-4
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.7 during vs 6.0 baseline
+0.7
Avg SRS
Higher is better
25.9 during vs 10.7 baseline
+15.3
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1899-1914 • 113-43-8
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
1897-1906 • 36-13-3
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
High Points
Best Season
Pittsburgh 1916
8-0 • SRS 41.4
Biggest Improvement
Pittsburgh 1915
8-0 • 27.1 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Carlisle 1901
5-7-1 • SRS -5.9
Biggest Drop
Carlisle 1914
5-10-1 • -23.8 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Temple | 1938 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 35.0% | — | — | 0.4 | — | — | — | -1.6 | -20.6% |
| Temple | 1937 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 55.6% | — | — | 2.0 | — | — | — | -2.4 | -8.1% |
| Temple | 1936 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 63.6% | — | — | 4.4 | — | — | — | -5.5 | -6.4% |
| Temple | 1935 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% | — | — | 9.9 | — | — | — | -8.5 | -10.0% |
| Temple | 1934 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 80.0% | — | — | 18.4 | — | — | — | +18.5 | +17.5% |
| Temple | 1933 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% | — | — | -0.1 | — | — | — | -17.1 | +3.4% |
| Stanford | 1932 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 59.1% | — | — | 17.0 | — | — | — | -3.9 | -13.6% |
| Stanford | 1931 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 72.7% | — | — | 20.9 | — | — | — | +12.7 | -13.6% |
| Stanford | 1930 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 86.4% | — | — | 8.2 | — | — | — | -16.9 | +4.5% |
| Stanford | 1929 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% | — | — | 25.1 | — | — | — | -0.3 | +11.0% |
| Stanford | 1928 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 70.8% | — | — | 25.4 | — | — | — | +6.5 | -6.4% |
| Stanford | 1927 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 77.3% | — | — | 18.9 | — | — | — | -4.3 | -18.2% |
| Stanford | 1926 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 95.5% | — | — | 23.2 | — | — | — | +1.3 | +17.7% |
| Stanford | 1925 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% | — | — | 21.9 | — | — | — | +5.0 | -5.6% |
| Stanford | 1924 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 83.3% | — | — | 16.9 | — | — | — | +1.9 | +27.8% |
| Pittsburgh | 1923 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% | — | — | 15.0 | — | — | — | -2.8 | -24.4% |
| Pittsburgh | 1922 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | 17.8 | — | — | — | -5.6 | +18.9% |
| Pittsburgh | 1921 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 61.1% | — | — | 23.4 | — | — | — | +3.6 | -26.4% |
| Pittsburgh | 1920 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 87.5% | — | — | 19.8 | — | — | — | -2.4 | +15.3% |
| Pittsburgh | 1919 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 72.2% | — | — | 22.2 | — | — | — | — | -7.8% |
| Pittsburgh | 1918 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -20.0% |
| Pittsburgh | 1917 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 36.4 | — | — | — | -5.0 | 0.0% |
| Pittsburgh | 1916 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 41.4 | — | — | — | +10.0 | 0.0% |
| Pittsburgh | 1915 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 31.4 | — | — | — | +27.1 | +65.6% |
| Carlisle | 1914 | 16 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 34.4% | — | — | 4.3 | — | — | — | -23.8 | -53.1% |
| Carlisle | 1913 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 87.5% | — | — | 28.1 | — | — | — | +2.7 | -1.8% |
| Carlisle | 1912 | 14 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 89.3% | — | — | 25.4 | — | — | — | -1.3 | -2.4% |
| Carlisle | 1911 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 91.7% | — | — | 26.7 | — | — | — | +16.4 | +34.5% |
| Carlisle | 1910 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% | — | — | 10.3 | — | — | — | -3.0 | -13.7% |
| Carlisle | 1909 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 70.8% | — | — | 13.3 | — | — | — | -6.5 | -9.9% |
| Carlisle | 1908 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 80.8% | — | — | 19.8 | — | — | — | -3.3 | -10.1% |
| Carlisle | 1907 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% | — | — | 23.1 | — | — | — | +1.6 | +9.1% |
| Cornell | 1906 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 81.8% | — | — | 21.5 | — | — | — | +24.0 | +21.8% |
| Cornell | 1905 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% | — | — | -2.5 | — | — | — | -14.5 | -10.0% |
| Cornell | 1904 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% | — | — | 12.0 | — | — | — | -9.3 | -12.1% |
| Carlisle | 1903 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 82.1% | — | — | 21.3 | — | — | — | +13.1 | +9.4% |
| Carlisle | 1902 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% | — | — | 8.2 | — | — | — | +14.1 | +30.4% |
| Carlisle | 1901 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 42.3% | — | — | -5.9 | — | — | — | -7.0 | -16.8% |
| Carlisle | 1900 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 59.1% | — | — | 1.1 | — | — | — | -11.8 | -22.7% |
| Carlisle | 1899 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% | — | — | 12.9 | — | — | — | -2.4 | -1.5% |
| Cornell | 1898 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | — | — | 15.3 | — | — | — | +1.7 | +22.2% |
| Cornell | 1897 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 61.1% | — | — | 13.6 | — | — | — | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS 17.0 • Peak SRS 30.5 • 40 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 9.1
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS 15.6 • Peak SRS 30.6 • 46 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 7.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 16.1 • Peak SRS 35.3 • 29 seasons
Best finish #0 • Volatility 11.8
Open profile →same balanced identity
Avg SRS 19.6 • Peak SRS 33.0 • 38 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 7.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.5
Avg SRS 19.8 • Peak SRS 33.6 • 28 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 9.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS 16.8 • Peak SRS 32.9 • 27 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 10.0
Open profile →