Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Keith Burns vs Todd Dodge
Keith Burns: 8th pct vs Todd Dodge: 5th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Keith BurnsTodd Dodge
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Keith Burns
Keith Burns: 17th pct vs Todd Dodge: 8th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Todd Dodge
Todd Dodge: 52nd pct vs Keith Burns: 31st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Keith Burns vs Todd Dodge
Keith Burns: 0 titles vs Todd Dodge: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Todd Dodge vs Keith Burns
Todd Dodge: 4 seasons vs Keith Burns: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Keith Burns
Keith Burns: 20.0% vs Todd Dodge: 14.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Todd Dodge and Keith Burns look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarTodd Dodge and Keith Burns look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Keith Burns
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -23.3
4th pct
Lower end
Todd Dodge
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -21.1
6th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Keith BurnsTodd Dodge
EliteStrongAverageLean
2000Actual season year • SRS range -31.8 to -9.22010
Active comparison point
Keith Burns • 2000
2000 Tulsa
Best season5-7 • SRS -9.2 • SP Overall -13.3
Win %
41.7%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
20.6 / 32.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Todd Dodge
Nearest year 2007 • North Texas
2-10 • SRS -20.4 • SP Overall -22.8
Keith Burns holds a 11.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +0.3 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keith Burns | |||||
| Tulsa | 2000-2002 | 3 | 7-28 | -20.2 | -9.2Highest peak |
| Todd Dodge | |||||
| North Texas | 2007-2010 | 4 | 6-37 | -21.0 | -15.5 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Keith Burns
7-28 • 20.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
-9.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Tulsa 2000
SRS -9.2
Worst Season
Tulsa 2001
SRS -27.9
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 2002
4.4 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Todd Dodge
6-37 • 14.0% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
52nd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
North Texas 2010
SRS -15.5
Worst Season
North Texas 2008
SRS -31.8
Biggest Improvement
North Texas 2009
15.5 SRS