2000-2002 • Tulsa
One defining stop at Tulsa.
Keith Burns coached 3 seasons, won 20.0%, and posted an average SRS of -20.2. Best season: 2000 Tulsa. The profile was offense-first with a highly volatile profile. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
7-28
Career Win %
20.0%
Seasons
3
Career Span
3 years
Average SRS
-20.2
Peak SRS
-9.2
Best Finish
—
Consistency
31.0
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
5-7 • SRS -9.2 • SP Overall -13.3
Win %
41.7%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
20.6 / 32.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Tulsa
2000-2002 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS -20.2 • Win % 20.0%
Longest Tenure
Tulsa • 3 seasons
Best Tenure
Tulsa • -20.2 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Tulsa • 20.0%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Keith Burns sets the reference point in overall strength.
Keith Burns sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Keith Burns
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -23.3
4th pct
Lower end
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2000-2002 • 7-28
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
2.3 during vs 3.2 baseline
-0.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-20.2 during vs -12.3 baseline
-7.9
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-23.3 during vs -12.5 baseline
-10.8
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Tulsa 2000
5-7 • SRS -9.2
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 2002
1-11 • 4.4 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Tulsa 2000
5-7 • SP Off 20.6
Best Defensive Season
Tulsa 2000
5-7 • SP Def 32.4
Setbacks
Worst Season
Tulsa 2001
1-10 • SRS -27.9
Biggest Drop
Tulsa 2001
1-10 • -18.7 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Tulsa | 2002 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 8.3% | — | — | -23.5 | -28.5 | 19.9 | 42.8 | +4.4 | -0.8% |
| Tulsa | 2001 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 9.1% | — | — | -27.9 | -28.1 | 19.0 | 42.4 | -18.7 | -32.6% |
| Tulsa | 2000 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -9.2 | -13.3 | 20.6 | 32.4 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS -21.0 • Peak SRS -15.5 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.5
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS -19.8 • Peak SRS -6.6 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 9.2
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.2
Avg SRS -21.4 • Peak SRS -14.3 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.2
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS -20.0 • Peak SRS -17.6 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.4
Open profile →same offense-first identity • volatility within 0.7
Avg SRS -17.0 • Peak SRS -4.1 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.3
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS -20.4 • Peak SRS -15.1 • 7 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.3
Open profile →