Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Bo Schembechler
Bo Schembechler: 97th pct vs Fielding Yost: 84th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Bo SchembechlerFielding Yost
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Fielding Yost vs Bo Schembechler
Fielding Yost: 100th pct vs Bo Schembechler: 98th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Bo Schembechler vs Fielding Yost
Bo Schembechler: 13th pct vs Fielding Yost: 12th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bo Schembechler vs Fielding Yost
Bo Schembechler: 0 titles vs Fielding Yost: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bo Schembechler vs Fielding Yost
Bo Schembechler: 27 seasons vs Fielding Yost: 26 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Fielding Yost
Fielding Yost: 83.3% vs Bo Schembechler: 77.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Bo Schembechler sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeBo Schembechler sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Bo Schembechler
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 22.0
98th pct
Elite
Fielding Yost
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Bo SchembechlerFielding Yost
EliteStrongAverageLean
Bo Schembechler: 1969 Michigan
1901Actual season year • SRS range -4.9 to 41.11989
Active comparison point
Bo Schembechler • 1973
1973 Michigan
Best season10-0-1 • SRS 32.9 • SP Overall 27.7
Win %
95.5%
YoY SRS
+9.0
SP Off / Def
34.9 / 7.4
Finish
#6
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Fielding Yost
Nearest year 1926 • Michigan
7-1 • SRS 23.8 • SP Overall —
Bo Schembechler holds a 9.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bo Schembechler | |||||
| Miami (OH) | 1963-1968 | 6 | 40-17-3 | 1.3 | 8.4 |
| Michigan | 1969-1989 | 21 | 194-48-5 | 21.3Best quality | 32.9 |
| Fielding Yost | |||||
| Michigan | 1901-1926 | 25 | 165-29-10 | 19.1 | 41.1Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Bo Schembechler
234-65-8 • 77.5% • 27 seasons • 0 titles
97th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Michigan 1973
SRS 32.9
Worst Season
Miami (OH) 1963
SRS -4.9
Biggest Improvement
Michigan 1969
22.4 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Fielding Yost
165-29-10 • 83.3% • 25 seasons • 0 titles
-0.4 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Michigan 1905
SRS 41.1
Worst Season
Michigan 1908
SRS -0.4
Biggest Improvement
Michigan 1913
33.2 SRS