Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Mark Stoops vs Matt Rhule
Mark Stoops: 55th pct vs Matt Rhule: 54th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mark StoopsMatt Rhule
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Mark Stoops vs Matt Rhule
Mark Stoops: 73rd pct vs Matt Rhule: 73rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Mark Stoops
Mark Stoops: 74th pct vs Matt Rhule: 50th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Mark Stoops vs Matt Rhule
Mark Stoops: 0 titles vs Matt Rhule: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Mark Stoops vs Matt Rhule
Mark Stoops: 13 seasons vs Matt Rhule: 13 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Mark Stoops vs Matt Rhule
Mark Stoops: 51.3% vs Matt Rhule: 51.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mark Stoops has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeMark Stoops has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mark Stoops
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 5.6
74th pct
Strong
Matt Rhule
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.3
68th pct
Above average
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mark StoopsMatt Rhule
EliteStrongAverageLean
Matt Rhule: 2017 BaylorMatt Rhule: 2023 Nebraska
2013Actual season year • SRS range -8.5 to 14.72025
Active comparison point
Mark Stoops • 2018
2018 Kentucky
Best seasonBiggest improvement10-3 • SRS 14.7 • SP Overall 13.1
Win %
76.9%
YoY SRS
+14.2
SP Off / Def
29.5 / 16.3
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Matt Rhule
Nearest year 2018 • Baylor
7-6 • SRS 2.6 • SP Overall 2.0
Mark Stoops holds a 12.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -3.6 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Stoops | |||||
| Kentucky | 2013-2025 | 13 | 77-73 | 3.2 | 14.7Longest stop |
| Matt Rhule | |||||
| Temple | 2013-2016 | 4 | 28-23 | 0.7 | 7.8 |
| Baylor | 2017-2019 | 3 | 19-20 | 4.4 | 14.7 |
| Nebraska | 2023-2025 | 3 | 12-13 | 4.1 | 8.5 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Mark Stoops
77-73 • 51.3% • 13 seasons • 0 titles
74th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Kentucky 2018
SRS 14.7
Worst Season
Kentucky 2013
SRS -6.4
Biggest Improvement
Kentucky 2018
14.2 SRS
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Matt Rhule
59-56 • 51.3% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
3 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Baylor 2019
SRS 14.7
Worst Season
Temple 2013
SRS -8.5
Biggest Improvement
Baylor 2019
12.1 SRS