2013-2025 • Baylor, Nebraska, Temple
3 schools coached, anchored by Temple.
Matt Rhule coached 10 seasons, won 51.3%, and posted an average SRS of 2.8. Best season: 2019 Baylor. The profile was defense-first with a swing-heavy profile. 3 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
59-56
Career Win %
51.3%
Seasons
10
Career Span
13 years
Average SRS
2.8
Peak SRS
14.7
Best Finish
#13
Consistency
50.3
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
11-3 • SRS 14.7 • SP Overall 17.8
Win %
78.6%
YoY SRS
+12.1
SP Off / Def
34.7 / 17.3
Finish
#13
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Nebraska
2023-2025 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS 4.1 • Win % 48.0%
Baylor
2017-2019 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS 4.4 • Win % 48.7%
Temple
2013-2016 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS 0.7 • Win % 54.9%
Longest Tenure
Temple • 4 seasons
Best Tenure
Baylor • 4.4 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Temple • 54.9%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Matt Rhule sets the reference point in overall strength.
Matt Rhule sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Matt Rhule
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.3
68th pct
Above average
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2023-2025 • 12-13
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
4.0 during vs 3.4 baseline
+0.6
Avg SRS
Higher is better
4.1 during vs 2.3 baseline
+1.8
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
4.0 during vs 5.0 baseline
-1.0
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
2017-2019 • 19-20
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.3 during vs 9.4 baseline
-3.1
Avg SRS
Higher is better
4.4 during vs 16.0 baseline
-11.6
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
6.1 during vs 17.2 baseline
-11.1
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
33.3% during vs 60.0% baseline
-26.7%
2013-2016 • 28-23
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.0 during vs 7.0 baseline
+0.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
0.7 during vs -2.3 baseline
+3.0
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
0.6 during vs -5.3 baseline
+5.9
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Baylor 2019
11-3 • SRS 14.7
Biggest Improvement
Baylor 2019
11-3 • 12.1 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Baylor 2019
11-3 • SP Off 34.7
Best Defensive Season
Nebraska 2023
5-7 • SP Def 13.9
Setbacks
Worst Season
Temple 2013
2-10 • SRS -8.5
Biggest Drop
Nebraska 2023
5-7 • -13.4 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Nebraska | 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 2.5 | 6.2 | 28.8 | 22.7 | -6.0 | — |
| Nebraska | 2024 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 8.5 | 5.5 | 23.1 | 15.8 | +7.2 | +12.2% |
| Nebraska | 2023 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | 1.3 | 0.3 | 15.6 | 13.9 | -13.4 | -36.9% |
| Baylor | 2019 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% | — | #13 | 14.7 | 17.8 | 34.7 | 17.3 | +12.1 | +24.7% |
| Baylor | 2018 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 2.6 | 2.0 | 33.1 | 30.3 | +6.8 | +45.5% |
| Baylor | 2017 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 8.3% | — | — | -4.2 | -1.4 | 26.9 | 29.0 | -12.0 | -68.6% |
| Temple | 2016 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% | — | — | 7.8 | 11.9 | 31.5 | 19.8 | +0.4 | +5.5% |
| Temple | 2015 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% | — | — | 7.4 | 6.0 | 26.4 | 20.6 | +11.5 | +21.4% |
| Temple | 2014 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -4.1 | -4.7 | 15.8 | 18.9 | +4.4 | +33.3% |
| Temple | 2013 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 16.7% | — | — | -8.5 | -10.7 | 27.6 | 37.0 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS 2.3 • Peak SRS 17.7 • 13 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.0
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 3.2 • Peak SRS 14.7 • 13 seasons
Best finish #18 • Volatility 5.1
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS 3.8 • Peak SRS 17.2 • 8 seasons
Best finish #18 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS 2.5 • Peak SRS 15.9 • 17 seasons
Best finish #15 • Volatility 7.0
Open profile →same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.5
Avg SRS 0.7 • Peak SRS 8.2 • 13 seasons
Best finish #16 • Volatility 6.2
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.9
Avg SRS 4.7 • Peak SRS 16.9 • 11 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 6.9
Open profile →