Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: JE Platt
JE Platt: 41st pct vs C Noel Workman: 21st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
C Noel WorkmanJE Platt
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: JE Platt vs C Noel Workman
JE Platt: 26th pct vs C Noel Workman: 24th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: C Noel Workman
C Noel Workman: 98th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: C Noel Workman vs JE Platt
C Noel Workman: 0 titles vs JE Platt: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: C Noel Workman vs JE Platt
C Noel Workman: 3 seasons vs JE Platt: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: JE Platt
JE Platt: 67.7% vs C Noel Workman: 14.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
C Noel Workman
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
JE Platt
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
C Noel WorkmanJE Platt
EliteStrongAverageLean
1903Actual season year • SRS range -9.0 to -4.21930
Active comparison point
C Noel Workman • 1930
1930 Iowa State
Best seasonBiggest drop0-9 • SRS -4.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
0.0%
YoY SRS
+1.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
JE Platt
Nearest year 1904 • Texas A&M
4-2 • SRS -9.0 • SP Overall —
C Noel Workman holds a 4.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C Noel Workman | |||||
| Iowa State | 1928-1930 | 3 | 3-21-1 | -6.5 | -4.9 |
| JE Platt | |||||
| Texas A&M | 1903-1904 | 2 | 11-5-1 | -6.6 | -4.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →C Noel Workman
3-21-1 • 14.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
98th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Iowa State 1930
SRS -4.9
Worst Season
Iowa State 1928
SRS -8.6
Biggest Improvement
Iowa State 1929
2.6 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →JE Platt
11-5-1 • 67.7% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
41st pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Texas A&M 1903
SRS -4.2
Worst Season
Texas A&M 1904
SRS -9.0
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 1904
-4.8 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.