Texas A&M
1903-1904 • 11-5-1
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
Avg SRS -6.6Win % 67.7%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.
← Back to Coaches
Coach ProfileBalanced
JE Platt
1903-1904 • Texas A&M
One defining stop at Texas A&M.
JE Platt coached 2 seasons, won 67.7%, and posted an average SRS of -6.6. Best season: 1903 Texas A&M. The profile was balanced with limited volatility context. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
11-5-1
Career Win %
67.7%
Seasons
2
Career Span
2 years
Average SRS
-6.6
Peak SRS
-4.2
Best Finish
—
Consistency
—
Higher = steadier
Career Arc
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
JE Platt
EliteStrongAverageLean
1903Actual season year • SRS range -9.0 to -4.21904
Active comparison point
JE Platt • 1903
1903 Texas A&M
Best season7-3-1 • SRS -4.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
68.2%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
School Tenures
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure
Texas A&M
1903-1904 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS -6.6 • Win % 67.7%
Longest Tenure
Texas A&M • 2 seasons
Best Tenure
Texas A&M • -6.6 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Texas A&M • 67.7%
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
JE Platt
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Impact by School
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
Career Highs and Lows
High Points
Best Season
Texas A&M 1903
7-3-1 • SRS -4.2
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 1904
4-2 • -4.8 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Texas A&M 1904
4-2 • SRS -9.0
Biggest Drop
Texas A&M 1904
4-2 • -4.8 SRS
Season-by-Season Results
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Texas A&M | 1904 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% | — | — | -9.0 | — | — | — | -4.8 | -1.5% |
| Texas A&M | 1903 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 68.2% | — | — | -4.2 | — | — | — | — | — |
Similar Coaches
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
AE Brides
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.9
Avg SRS -7.5 • Peak SRS -5.3 • 2 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 2.1
Open profile →C Noel Workman
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS -6.5 • Peak SRS -4.9 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 1.6
Open profile →Bernard Mertes
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS -6.5 • Peak SRS -4.7 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 2.3
Open profile →John Coatta
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.3
Avg SRS -7.9 • Peak SRS -4.7 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 2.5
Open profile →Irl Tubbs
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.6
Avg SRS -5.0 • Peak SRS -2.0 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 2.1
Open profile →George Huff
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS -7.1 • Peak SRS -4.6 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 1.9
Open profile →