Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Dean Pees vs Keith Burns
Dean Pees: 10th pct vs Keith Burns: 8th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Dean Pees vs Keith Burns
Dean Pees: 10th pct vs Keith Burns: 8th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Dean Pees
Dean Pees: 21st pct vs Keith Burns: 17th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Keith Burns
Keith Burns: 31st pct vs Dean Pees: 18th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dean Pees vs Keith Burns
Dean Pees: 0 titles vs Keith Burns: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Dean Pees
Dean Pees: 6 seasons vs Keith Burns: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Dean Pees
Dean Pees: 25.0% vs Keith Burns: 20.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dean Pees has the edge in overall strength.
Dean Pees has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dean Pees
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -18.1
10th pct
Lower end
Keith Burns
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -23.3
4th pct
Lower end
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
6-5 • SRS -6.6 • SP Overall -3.8
Win %
54.5%
YoY SRS
+19.7
SP Off / Def
27.4 / 31.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Keith Burns
Nearest year 2001 • Tulsa
1-10 • SRS -27.9 • SP Overall -28.1
Dean Pees holds a 21.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +8.4 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dean Pees | |||||
| Kent State | 1998-2003 | 6 | 17-51 | -19.8 | -6.6Highest peak |
| Keith Burns | |||||
| Tulsa | 2000-2002 | 3 | 7-28 | -20.2 | -9.2 |
Closing takeaway
17-51 • 25.0% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
6 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
Kent State 2001
SRS -6.6
Worst Season
Kent State 1998
SRS -33.0
Biggest Improvement
Kent State 2001
19.7 SRS
7-28 • 20.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
31st pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Tulsa 2000
SRS -9.2
Worst Season
Tulsa 2001
SRS -27.9
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 2002
4.4 SRS