Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Matt Rhule vs Don Fambrough
Matt Rhule: 54th pct vs Don Fambrough: 53rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Matt Rhule vs Don Fambrough
Matt Rhule: 54th pct vs Don Fambrough: 53rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Don Fambrough
Don Fambrough: 79th pct vs Matt Rhule: 73rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Matt Rhule
Matt Rhule: 50th pct vs Don Fambrough: 38th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Don Fambrough vs Matt Rhule
Don Fambrough: 0 titles vs Matt Rhule: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Matt Rhule vs Don Fambrough
Matt Rhule: 13 seasons vs Don Fambrough: 12 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Matt Rhule
Matt Rhule: 51.3% vs Don Fambrough: 42.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Matt Rhule and Don Fambrough look similar in overall strength.
Matt Rhule and Don Fambrough look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Don Fambrough
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.1
67th pct
Above average
Matt Rhule
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.3
68th pct
Above average
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
7-4-1 • SRS 17.2 • SP Overall 14.5
Win %
62.5%
YoY SRS
+13.5
SP Off / Def
30.4 / 17.0
Finish
#18
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Matt Rhule
Nearest year 2013 • Temple
2-10 • SRS -8.5 • SP Overall -10.7
Don Fambrough holds a 25.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +2.8 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Don Fambrough | |||||
| Kansas | 1971-1982 | 8 | 36-49-5 | 3.8 | 17.2Highest peak |
| Matt Rhule | |||||
| Temple | 2013-2016 | 4 | 28-23 | 0.7 | 7.8 |
| Baylor | 2017-2019 | 3 | 19-20 | 4.4 | 14.7 |
| Nebraska | 2023-2025 | 3 | 12-13 | 4.1 | 8.5 |
Closing takeaway
36-49-5 • 42.8% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
17.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Kansas 1973
SRS 17.2
Worst Season
Kansas 1982
SRS -9.1
Biggest Improvement
Kansas 1980
13.6 SRS
59-56 • 51.3% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
50th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Baylor 2019
SRS 14.7
Worst Season
Temple 2013
SRS -8.5
Biggest Improvement
Baylor 2019
12.1 SRS