Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Fritz Crisler vs Jim Harbaugh
Fritz Crisler: 97th pct vs Jim Harbaugh: 95th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jim HarbaughFritz Crisler
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Fritz Crisler vs Jim Harbaugh
Fritz Crisler: 98th pct vs Jim Harbaugh: 97th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Fritz Crisler vs Jim Harbaugh
Fritz Crisler: 14th pct vs Jim Harbaugh: 14th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Harbaugh
Jim Harbaugh: 1 title vs Fritz Crisler: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Fritz Crisler vs Jim Harbaugh
Fritz Crisler: 18 seasons vs Jim Harbaugh: 17 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Fritz Crisler
Fritz Crisler: 76.8% vs Jim Harbaugh: 72.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jim Harbaugh sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeJim Harbaugh sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jim Harbaugh
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 18.3
96th pct
Elite
Fritz Crisler
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jim HarbaughFritz Crisler
EliteStrongAverageLean
Jim Harbaugh: 2015 MichiganFritz Crisler: 1932 PrincetonFritz Crisler: 1938 Michigan
1930Actual season year • SRS range -2.5 to 31.62023
Active comparison point
Jim Harbaugh • 2010
2010 Stanford
Best seasonBiggest improvement12-1 • SRS 30.2 • SP Overall 28.1
Win %
92.3%
YoY SRS
+19.2
SP Off / Def
44.4 / 17.3
Finish
#4
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Fritz Crisler
Nearest year 1947 • Michigan
10-0 • SRS 31.6 • SP Overall —
Jim Harbaugh trails by a 1.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Harbaugh | |||||
| Stanford | 2007-2010 | 4 | 29-21 | 10.2 | 30.2 |
| Michigan | 2015-2023 | 9 | 89-25 | 17.4 | 25.9 |
| Fritz Crisler | |||||
| Minnesota | 1930-1931 | 2 | 10-7-1 | 8.9 | 13.9 |
| Princeton | 1932-1937 | 6 | 35-9-5 | 9.0 | 19.0 |
| Michigan | 1938-1947 | 10 | 71-16-3 | 23.4Best quality | 31.6Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
More titles
Full profile →Jim Harbaugh
118-46 • 72.0% • 13 seasons • 1 title
1 national championship season.
Best Season
Stanford 2010
SRS 30.2
Worst Season
Stanford 2007
SRS -2.5
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 2010
19.2 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Fritz Crisler
116-32-9 • 76.8% • 18 seasons • 0 titles
1.3 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Michigan 1947
SRS 31.6
Worst Season
Princeton 1937
SRS 1.3
Biggest Improvement
Michigan 1940
21.7 SRS