2007-2023 • Michigan, Stanford
2 schools coached, anchored by Michigan.
Jim Harbaugh coached 13 seasons, won 72.0%, and posted an average SRS of 15.2. Best season: 2010 Stanford. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 2 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
118-46
Career Win %
72.0%
Seasons
13
Career Span
17 years
Average SRS
15.2
Peak SRS
30.2
Best Finish
#1
Consistency
14.2
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
12-1 • SRS 30.2 • SP Overall 28.1
Win %
92.3%
YoY SRS
+19.2
SP Off / Def
44.4 / 17.3
Finish
#4
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Michigan
2015-2023 • 9 seasons
Avg SRS 17.4 • Win % 78.1%
Stanford
2007-2010 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS 10.2 • Win % 58.0%
Longest Tenure
Michigan • 9 seasons
Best Tenure
Michigan • 17.4 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Michigan • 78.1%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jim Harbaugh sets the reference point in overall strength.
Jim Harbaugh sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jim Harbaugh
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 18.3
96th pct
Elite
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2015-2023 • 89-25
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
9.9 during vs 7.6 baseline
+2.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
17.4 during vs 7.3 baseline
+10.1
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
22.6 during vs 13.5 baseline
+9.1
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
66.7% during vs 40.0% baseline
+26.7%
2007-2010 • 29-21
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.3 during vs 3.2 baseline
+4.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
10.2 during vs -1.3 baseline
+11.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
8.6 during vs -2.3 baseline
+10.8
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
25.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+25.0%
High Points
Best Season
Stanford 2010
12-1 • SRS 30.2
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 2010
12-1 • 19.2 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Stanford 2010
12-1 • SP Off 44.4
Best Defensive Season
Michigan 2023
15-0 • SP Def 7.2
Setbacks
Worst Season
Stanford 2007
4-8 • SRS -2.5
Biggest Drop
Michigan 2020
2-4 • -18.7 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Michigan | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | #2 | #1 | 25.9 | 31.3 | 36.6 | 7.2 | +4.8 | +7.1% |
| Michigan | 2022 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 92.9% | #8 | #3 | 21.1 | 32.0 | 38.0 | 7.6 | +2.8 | +7.1% |
| Michigan | 2021 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 85.7% | — | #3 | 18.3 | 23.4 | 36.5 | 15.8 | +18.9 | +52.4% |
| Michigan | 2020 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% | #16 | — | -0.6 | 10.7 | 33.0 | 22.2 | -18.7 | -35.9% |
| Michigan | 2019 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | #7 | #18 | 18.1 | 20.7 | 35.7 | 16.0 | -0.9 | -7.7% |
| Michigan | 2018 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% | #14 | — | 19.0 | 22.0 | 35.5 | 14.3 | +6.1 | +15.4% |
| Michigan | 2017 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #11 | — | 12.9 | 19.6 | 31.1 | 11.8 | -11.2 | -15.4% |
| Michigan | 2016 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% | #7 | #10 | 24.1 | 24.4 | 34.8 | 11.1 | +6.6 | 0.0% |
| Michigan | 2015 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% | — | #12 | 17.5 | 19.7 | 35.2 | 16.2 | -12.7 | -15.4% |
| Stanford | 2010 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% | — | #4 | 30.2 | 28.1 | 44.4 | 17.3 | +19.2 | +30.8% |
| Stanford | 2009 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | — | — | 11.0 | 10.7 | 39.2 | 30.6 | +9.1 | +19.9% |
| Stanford | 2008 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | 1.9 | 2.2 | 30.2 | 29.5 | +4.4 | +8.3% |
| Stanford | 2007 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -2.5 | -6.7 | 21.0 | 27.4 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.8
Avg SRS 17.0 • Peak SRS 31.6 • 18 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 9.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.4
Avg SRS 13.8 • Peak SRS 33.6 • 16 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 10.4
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 15.2 • Peak SRS 37.9 • 16 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 12.1
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 15.1 • Peak SRS 28.9 • 11 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 9.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 15.0 • Peak SRS 26.7 • 11 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS 16.2 • Peak SRS 32.7 • 18 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 7.9
Open profile →