2008-2025 • Clemson
One defining stop at Clemson.
Dabo Swinney coached 18 seasons, won 79.3%, and posted an average SRS of 16.2. Best season: 2018 Clemson. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
180-47
Career Win %
79.3%
Seasons
18
Career Span
18 years
Average SRS
16.2
Peak SRS
32.7
Best Finish
#1
Consistency
32.9
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
15-0 • SRS 32.7 • SP Overall 29.7
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+6.8
SP Off / Def
43.0 / 12.6
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Clemson
2008-2025 • 18 seasons
Avg SRS 16.2 • Win % 79.3%
Longest Tenure
Clemson • 18 seasons
Best Tenure
Clemson • 16.2 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Clemson • 79.3%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dabo Swinney sets the reference point in overall strength.
Dabo Swinney sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dabo Swinney
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 18.5
97th pct
Elite
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2008-2025 • 180-47
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
10.0 during vs 8.0 baseline
+2.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
16.2 during vs 11.6 baseline
+4.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
18.5 during vs 14.4 baseline
+4.1
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
77.8% during vs 60.0% baseline
+17.8%
High Points
Best Season
Clemson 2018
15-0 • SRS 32.7
Biggest Improvement
Clemson 2012
11-2 • 9.7 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Clemson 2019
14-1 • SP Off 43.5
Best Defensive Season
Clemson 2017
12-2 • SP Def 8.3
Setbacks
Worst Season
Clemson 2025
0-0 • SRS 6.2
Biggest Drop
Clemson 2010
6-7 • -6.9 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Clemson | 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 6.2 | 9.5 | 27.5 | 18.9 | -5.7 | — |
| Clemson | 2024 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% | #14 | #14 | 11.9 | 13.3 | 35.4 | 20.9 | +1.1 | +2.2% |
| Clemson | 2023 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | #9 | #20 | 10.8 | 10.5 | 29.3 | 19.0 | -3.1 | -9.3% |
| Clemson | 2022 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% | #4 | #13 | 13.9 | 17.6 | 34.9 | 18.5 | +2.8 | +1.7% |
| Clemson | 2021 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% | #3 | #14 | 11.1 | 18.7 | 28.3 | 11.6 | — | -6.4% |
| Clemson | 2020 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | #1 | #3 | — | — | — | — | — | -10.0% |
| Clemson | 2019 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 93.3% | #1 | #2 | 28.6 | 28.1 | 43.5 | 14.6 | -4.1 | -6.7% |
| Clemson | 2018 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | #2 | — | 32.7 | 29.7 | 43.0 | 12.6 | +6.8 | +14.3% |
| Clemson | 2017 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 85.7% | #5 | #4 | 25.9 | 26.4 | 36.5 | 8.3 | +0.6 | -7.6% |
| Clemson | 2016 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 93.3% | #2 | #1 | 25.3 | 28.7 | 43.5 | 14.1 | +3.0 | 0.0% |
| Clemson | 2015 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 93.3% | #12 | #2 | 22.3 | 24.0 | 41.9 | 17.2 | +8.4 | +16.4% |
| Clemson | 2014 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% | #16 | #15 | 13.9 | 18.1 | 29.0 | 11.6 | -4.3 | -7.7% |
| Clemson | 2013 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #8 | #8 | 18.2 | 24.5 | 42.4 | 19.6 | +2.2 | 0.0% |
| Clemson | 2012 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #14 | #11 | 16.0 | 18.5 | 41.5 | 24.1 | +9.7 | +13.2% |
| Clemson | 2011 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% | — | #22 | 6.3 | 7.8 | 35.4 | 28.9 | -2.0 | +25.3% |
| Clemson | 2010 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.2% | — | — | 8.3 | 10.1 | 24.0 | 13.3 | -6.9 | -18.1% |
| Clemson | 2009 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% | — | #24 | 15.2 | 16.4 | 31.1 | 14.4 | +6.8 | +7.1% |
| Clemson | 2008 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% | #9 | — | 8.4 | 12.8 | 27.0 | 14.2 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.2
Avg SRS 15.0 • Peak SRS 26.7 • 11 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.1
Avg SRS 18.5 • Peak SRS 33.9 • 17 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 7.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 17.0 • Peak SRS 31.6 • 18 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 9.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.7
Avg SRS 14.4 • Peak SRS 24.7 • 15 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 6.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.5
Avg SRS 14.0 • Peak SRS 25.9 • 14 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 7.3
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.3
Avg SRS 14.9 • Peak SRS 24.4 • 17 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 6.4
Open profile →