Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Charlie Weatherbie
Charlie Weatherbie: 29th pct vs Charlie Bailey: 20th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Charlie Weatherbie
Charlie Weatherbie: 29th pct vs Charlie Bailey: 20th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Charlie Weatherbie
Charlie Weatherbie: 51st pct vs Charlie Bailey: 38th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Charlie Bailey
Charlie Bailey: 34th pct vs Charlie Weatherbie: 27th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Charlie Bailey vs Charlie Weatherbie
Charlie Bailey: 0 titles vs Charlie Weatherbie: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Charlie Weatherbie
Charlie Weatherbie: 18 seasons vs Charlie Bailey: 14 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Charlie Weatherbie
Charlie Weatherbie: 39.8% vs Charlie Bailey: 30.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Charlie Weatherbie has the edge in overall strength.
Charlie Weatherbie has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Charlie Weatherbie
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -13.1
19th pct
Lower end
Charlie Bailey
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -15.3
14th pct
Lower end
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-3 • SRS 6.1 • SP Overall 5.7
Win %
75.0%
YoY SRS
+6.5
SP Off / Def
39.0 / 34.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Charlie Bailey
Nearest year 1996 • UTEP
2-9 • SRS -18.4 • SP Overall -23.9
Charlie Weatherbie holds a 24.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +22.8 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Weatherbie | |||||
| Utah State | 1992-1994 | 3 | 15-19 | -9.2 | -5.5 |
| Navy | 1995-2001 | 7 | 30-45 | -5.5 | 6.1Highest peak |
| UL Monroe | 2003-2009 | 7 | 31-51 | -15.2 | -8.7 |
| Charlie Bailey | |||||
| Memphis | 1986-1988 | 3 | 12-20-1 | -5.6 | 1.2 |
| UTEP | 1993-1999 | 7 | 19-53-1 | -15.7 | -11.1 |
Closing takeaway
76-115 • 39.8% • 17 seasons • 0 titles
6.1 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Navy 1996
SRS 6.1
Worst Season
UL Monroe 2005
SRS -21.6
Biggest Improvement
Navy 1995
14.0 SRS
31-73-2 • 30.2% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
34th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Memphis 1987
SRS 1.2
Worst Season
UTEP 1995
SRS -25.1
Biggest Improvement
Memphis 1987
19.6 SRS