1992-2009 • Navy, UL Monroe, Utah State
3 schools coached, anchored by Navy.
Charlie Weatherbie coached 17 seasons, won 39.8%, and posted an average SRS of -10.2. Best season: 1996 Navy. The profile was offense-first with a highly volatile profile. 3 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
76-115
Career Win %
39.8%
Seasons
17
Career Span
18 years
Average SRS
-10.2
Peak SRS
6.1
Best Finish
—
Consistency
26.6
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-3 • SRS 6.1 • SP Overall 5.7
Win %
75.0%
YoY SRS
+6.5
SP Off / Def
39.0 / 34.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
UL Monroe
2003-2009 • 7 seasons
Avg SRS -15.2 • Win % 37.8%
Navy
1995-2001 • 7 seasons
Avg SRS -5.5 • Win % 40.0%
Utah State
1992-1994 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS -9.2 • Win % 44.1%
Longest Tenure
UL Monroe • 7 seasons
Best Tenure
Navy • -5.5 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Utah State • 44.1%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Charlie Weatherbie sets the reference point in overall strength.
Charlie Weatherbie sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Charlie Weatherbie
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -13.1
19th pct
Lower end
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2003-2009 • 31-51
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
4.4 during vs 2.9 baseline
+1.5
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-15.2 during vs -22.8 baseline
+7.6
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-20.6 during vs -24.5 baseline
+3.9
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1995-2001 • 30-45
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
4.3 during vs 2.8 baseline
+1.5
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-5.5 during vs -16.7 baseline
+11.2
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-7.8 during vs -18.1 baseline
+10.3
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1992-1994 • 15-19
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.0 during vs 4.6 baseline
+0.4
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-9.2 during vs -14.2 baseline
+5.0
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-7.7 during vs -11.8 baseline
+4.0
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Navy 1996
9-3 • SRS 6.1
Biggest Improvement
Navy 1995
5-6 • 14.0 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Navy 1996
9-3 • SP Off 39.0
Best Defensive Season
Navy 1995
5-6 • SP Def 25.6
Setbacks
Worst Season
UL Monroe 2005
5-6 • SRS -21.6
Biggest Drop
Navy 1998
3-8 • -18.6 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| UL Monroe | 2009 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -11.8 | -15.6 | 19.6 | 33.3 | +4.1 | +16.7% |
| UL Monroe | 2008 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -15.9 | -26.7 | 16.6 | 41.1 | -7.2 | -16.7% |
| UL Monroe | 2007 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -8.7 | -21.0 | 16.3 | 36.2 | +0.4 | +16.7% |
| UL Monroe | 2006 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -9.1 | -15.0 | 17.4 | 32.5 | +12.5 | -12.1% |
| UL Monroe | 2005 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -21.6 | -22.6 | 17.3 | 40.0 | -3.6 | 0.0% |
| UL Monroe | 2004 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -18.0 | -17.2 | 20.2 | 35.7 | +3.2 | +37.1% |
| UL Monroe | 2003 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 8.3% | — | — | -21.2 | -26.0 | 27.6 | 46.1 | -3.5 | +8.3% |
| Navy | 2001 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | — | — | -17.7 | -24.0 | 21.1 | 41.2 | +0.2 | -9.1% |
| Navy | 2000 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 9.1% | — | — | -17.9 | -17.5 | 23.8 | 38.9 | -16.0 | -32.6% |
| Navy | 1999 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -1.9 | -2.0 | 31.2 | 33.5 | +10.8 | +14.4% |
| Navy | 1998 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 27.3% | — | — | -12.7 | -15.0 | 27.6 | 39.2 | -18.6 | -36.4% |
| Navy | 1997 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% | — | — | 5.9 | 4.4 | 34.2 | 31.8 | -0.2 | -11.4% |
| Navy | 1996 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% | — | — | 6.1 | 5.7 | 39.0 | 34.4 | +6.5 | +29.5% |
| Navy | 1995 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -0.4 | -6.1 | 19.7 | 25.6 | +14.0 | +18.2% |
| Utah State | 1994 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 27.3% | — | — | -14.4 | -13.3 | 21.0 | 32.8 | -8.9 | -31.1% |
| Utah State | 1993 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | -5.5 | -3.7 | 35.0 | 37.5 | +2.2 | +12.9% |
| Utah State | 1992 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -7.7 | -6.2 | 32.3 | 37.1 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same offense-first identity • volatility within 0.6
Avg SRS -12.7 • Peak SRS 1.2 • 10 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.8
Open profile →same offense-first identity • volatility within 0.4
Avg SRS -7.0 • Peak SRS 3.6 • 8 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.8
Open profile →avg SRS within 0.9 • volatility within 0.5
Avg SRS -9.2 • Peak SRS 0.8 • 13 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 9.0
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS -9.9 • Peak SRS 3.6 • 7 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.6
Open profile →same offense-first identity • volatility within 0.1
Avg SRS -12.6 • Peak SRS 1.6 • 11 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.5
Open profile →same offense-first identity • volatility within 1.1
Avg SRS -12.2 • Peak SRS -3.4 • 12 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.3
Open profile →