Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Frank Murray
Frank Murray: 54th pct vs Jim Grobe: 44th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Frank MurrayJim Grobe
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: Frank Murray
Frank Murray: 81st pct vs Jim Grobe: 56th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Jim Grobe
Jim Grobe: 41st pct vs Frank Murray: 22nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Frank Murray vs Jim Grobe
Frank Murray: 0 titles vs Jim Grobe: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Frank Murray vs Jim Grobe
Frank Murray: 23 seasons vs Jim Grobe: 22 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Frank Murray
Frank Murray: 57.1% vs Jim Grobe: 49.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jim Grobe sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeJim Grobe sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Frank Murray
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Jim Grobe
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -0.4
55th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Frank MurrayJim Grobe
EliteStrongAverageLean
Frank Murray: 1937 VirginiaFrank Murray: 1946 MarquetteJim Grobe: 2001 Wake ForestJim Grobe: 2016 Baylor
1927Actual season year • SRS range -20.5 to 18.42016
Active comparison point
Frank Murray • 1936
1936 Marquette
Best season7-2 • SRS 18.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
77.8%
YoY SRS
+1.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#20
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jim Grobe
Nearest year 1995 • Ohio
2-8-1 • SRS -20.5 • SP Overall -21.1
Frank Murray holds a 38.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Murray | |||||
| Marquette | 1927-1949 | 14 | 70-48-5 | 1.3 | 18.4Highest peak |
| Virginia | 1937-1945 | 9 | 41-34-5 | -5.5 | 7.9 |
| Jim Grobe | |||||
| Ohio | 1995-2000 | 6 | 33-33-1 | -6.6 | 2.2 |
| Wake Forest | 2001-2013 | 13 | 77-82 | 0.9 | 8.0 |
| Baylor | 2016-2016 | 1 | 7-6 | 3.9Best quality | 3.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Frank Murray
111-82-10 • 57.1% • 23 seasons • 0 titles
18.4 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Marquette 1936
SRS 18.4
Worst Season
Virginia 1937
SRS -17.4
Biggest Improvement
Marquette 1935
14.5 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Jim Grobe
117-121-1 • 49.2% • 20 seasons • 0 titles
41st pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Wake Forest 2006
SRS 8.0
Worst Season
Ohio 1995
SRS -20.5
Biggest Improvement
Ohio 1996
16.1 SRS