1995-2016 • Baylor, Ohio, Wake Forest
3 schools coached, anchored by Wake Forest.
Jim Grobe coached 20 seasons, won 49.2%, and posted an average SRS of -1.2. Best season: 2006 Wake Forest. The profile was balanced with a swing-heavy profile. 3 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
117-121-1
Career Win %
49.2%
Seasons
20
Career Span
22 years
Average SRS
-1.2
Peak SRS
8.0
Best Finish
#18
Consistency
41.5
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
11-3 • SRS 8.0 • SP Overall 6.5
Win %
78.6%
YoY SRS
+8.9
SP Off / Def
23.6 / 18.4
Finish
#18
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Baylor
2016-2016 • 1 seasons
Avg SRS 3.9 • Win % 53.8%
Wake Forest
2001-2013 • 13 seasons
Avg SRS 0.9 • Win % 48.4%
Ohio
1995-2000 • 6 seasons
Avg SRS -6.6 • Win % 50.0%
Longest Tenure
Wake Forest • 13 seasons
Best Tenure
Baylor • 3.9 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Baylor • 53.8%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jim Grobe sets the reference point in overall strength.
Jim Grobe sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jim Grobe
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -0.4
55th pct
Mixed
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2016-2016 • 7-6
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.0 during vs 10.0 baseline
-3.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
3.9 during vs 17.7 baseline
-13.8
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
11.3 during vs 17.1 baseline
-5.8
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 80.0% baseline
-80.0%
2001-2013 • 77-82
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.9 during vs 4.0 baseline
+1.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
0.9 during vs -5.6 baseline
+6.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
0.3 during vs -7.9 baseline
+8.2
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
7.7% during vs 0.0% baseline
+7.7%
1995-2000 • 33-33-1
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.5 during vs 1.6 baseline
+3.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-6.6 during vs -25.1 baseline
+18.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-3.9 during vs -20.4 baseline
+16.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Wake Forest 2006
11-3 • SRS 8.0
Biggest Improvement
Ohio 1996
6-6 • 16.1 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Wake Forest 2003
5-7 • SP Off 37.8
Best Defensive Season
Wake Forest 2008
8-5 • SP Def 13.6
Setbacks
Worst Season
Ohio 1995
2-8-1 • SRS -20.5
Biggest Drop
Ohio 1998
5-6 • -11.8 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Baylor | 2016 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | #23 | — | 3.9 | 11.3 | 37.0 | 24.2 | +5.7 | +20.5% |
| Wake Forest | 2013 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -1.8 | -2.8 | 19.4 | 21.3 | +10.0 | -8.3% |
| Wake Forest | 2012 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -11.8 | -11.9 | 20.1 | 30.1 | -8.9 | -4.5% |
| Wake Forest | 2011 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.2% | — | — | -2.9 | -3.5 | 26.4 | 28.9 | +5.7 | +21.1% |
| Wake Forest | 2010 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 25.0% | — | — | -8.6 | -12.1 | 20.7 | 32.4 | -11.7 | -16.7% |
| Wake Forest | 2009 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | 3.1 | 3.3 | 32.6 | 28.3 | -4.5 | -19.9% |
| Wake Forest | 2008 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #23 | — | 7.6 | 6.4 | 20.3 | 13.6 | +1.0 | -7.7% |
| Wake Forest | 2007 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 6.6 | 6.4 | 23.9 | 19.0 | -1.4 | -9.3% |
| Wake Forest | 2006 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% | — | #18 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 23.6 | 18.4 | +8.9 | +42.2% |
| Wake Forest | 2005 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% | — | — | -0.9 | -3.9 | 23.3 | 27.1 | -1.6 | 0.0% |
| Wake Forest | 2004 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% | — | — | 0.7 | -0.9 | 26.2 | 27.3 | -4.6 | -5.3% |
| Wake Forest | 2003 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | 5.3 | 7.5 | 37.8 | 32.4 | -0.2 | -12.2% |
| Wake Forest | 2002 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 5.5 | 7.5 | 35.2 | 29.5 | +4.1 | -0.7% |
| Wake Forest | 2001 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% | — | — | 1.4 | 1.5 | 35.6 | 34.6 | +1.9 | -9.1% |
| Ohio | 2000 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% | — | — | -0.5 | -0.7 | 29.3 | 30.2 | +6.4 | +18.2% |
| Ohio | 1999 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -6.9 | -6.7 | 27.8 | 33.7 | +2.7 | 0.0% |
| Ohio | 1998 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -9.6 | -3.7 | 30.1 | 33.6 | -11.8 | -27.3% |
| Ohio | 1997 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% | — | — | 2.2 | 7.5 | 29.0 | 22.8 | +6.6 | +22.7% |
| Ohio | 1996 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -4.4 | 1.2 | 27.8 | 27.3 | +16.1 | +27.3% |
| Ohio | 1995 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 22.7% | — | — | -20.5 | -21.1 | 18.0 | 36.9 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS -0.8 • Peak SRS 20.5 • 25 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS -1.4 • Peak SRS 18.4 • 23 seasons
Best finish #20 • Volatility 8.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS -2.2 • Peak SRS 7.8 • 10 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.2
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS -0.8 • Peak SRS 10.2 • 19 seasons
Best finish #22 • Volatility 7.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS -0.2 • Peak SRS 14.3 • 22 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 7.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS -0.8 • Peak SRS 9.3 • 17 seasons
Best finish #0 • Volatility 7.1
Open profile →