Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Swede Larson
Swede Larson: 80th pct vs David McWilliams: 63rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
David McWilliamsSwede Larson
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: David McWilliams
David McWilliams: 82nd pct vs Swede Larson: 76th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: David McWilliams
David McWilliams: 51st pct vs Swede Larson: 47th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: David McWilliams vs Swede Larson
David McWilliams: 0 titles vs Swede Larson: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: David McWilliams
David McWilliams: 5 seasons vs Swede Larson: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Swede Larson
Swede Larson: 64.8% vs David McWilliams: 54.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
David McWilliams sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDavid McWilliams sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
David McWilliams
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 9.7
84th pct
Strong
Swede Larson
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
David McWilliamsSwede Larson
EliteStrongAverageLean
1939Actual season year • SRS range -1.1 to 18.61991
Active comparison point
David McWilliams • 1990
1990 Texas
Best seasonBiggest improvement10-2 • SRS 18.6 • SP Overall 24.9
Win %
83.3%
YoY SRS
+15.3
SP Off / Def
40.6 / 17.5
Finish
#12
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Swede Larson
Nearest year 1941 • Navy
7-1-1 • SRS 16.2 • SP Overall —
David McWilliams holds a 2.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David McWilliams | |||||
| Texas | 1987-1991 | 5 | 31-26 | 6.8 | 18.6Highest peak |
| Swede Larson | |||||
| Navy | 1939-1941 | 3 | 16-8-3 | 6.8 | 16.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →David McWilliams
31-26 • 54.4% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
18.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Texas 1990
SRS 18.6
Worst Season
Texas 1988
SRS -1.1
Biggest Improvement
Texas 1990
15.3 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Swede Larson
16-8-3 • 64.8% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
80th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Navy 1941
SRS 16.2
Worst Season
Navy 1939
SRS 0.0
Biggest Improvement
Navy 1941
12.0 SRS