← Back to Coaches
Coach ProfileBalanced

Swede Larson

1939-1941Navy

One defining stop at Navy.

Swede Larson coached 3 seasons, won 64.8%, and posted an average SRS of 6.8. Best season: 1941 Navy. The profile was balanced with a swing-heavy profile. One primary stop defined the run.

Career Record

16-8-3

Career Win %

64.8%

Seasons

3

Career Span

3 years

Average SRS

6.8

Peak SRS

16.2

Best Finish

#10

Consistency

47.1

Higher = steadier

Career Arc

Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Swede Larson
EliteStrongAverageLean
1939Actual season year • SRS range 0.0 to 16.21941

Active comparison point

Swede Larson1941

Selected

1941 Navy

Best seasonBiggest improvement

7-1-1 • SRS 16.2 • SP Overall

Win %

83.3%

YoY SRS

+12.0

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

#10

Comparison context

Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.

School Tenures

Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.

Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure

Navy

1939-19413 seasons

Avg SRS 6.8 • Win % 64.8%

Longest Tenure

Navy • 3 seasons

Best Tenure

Navy • 6.8 SRS

Best Tenure Win %

Navy • 64.8%

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Swede Larson

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Impact by School

See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.

Navy

1939-194116-8-3

Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).

Avg SRS 6.8Win % 64.8%

Avg wins

Higher is better

5.3 during vs 5.4 baseline

-0.1

Avg SRS

Higher is better

6.8 during vs 6.2 baseline

+0.6

Avg SP Overall

Higher is better

during vs baseline

Ranked finish rate

Higher is better

33.3% during vs 20.0% baseline

+13.3%

Career Highs and Lows

High Points

Best Season

Navy 1941

7-1-1SRS 16.2

Biggest Improvement

Navy 1941

7-1-112.0 SRS

Best Offensive Season

Unavailable

Best Defensive Season

Unavailable

Setbacks

Worst Season

Navy 1939

3-5-1SRS 0.0

Biggest Drop

Navy 1940

6-2-14.2 SRS

Season-by-Season Results

Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.

Navy1941971183.3%#1016.2+12.0+11.1%
Navy1940962172.2%4.2+4.2+33.3%
Navy1939935138.9%0.0

Similar Coaches

Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.

Don Clark

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2

Balanced

Avg SRS 6.6 • Peak SRS 15.23 seasons

Best finish #14 • Volatility 7.7

Open profile →

John Chalmers

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2

Balanced

Avg SRS 6.6 • Peak SRS 17.13 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.8

Open profile →

David McWilliams

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0

Balanced

Avg SRS 6.8 • Peak SRS 18.65 seasons

Best finish #12 • Volatility 6.7

Open profile →

Tom Barry

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2

Balanced

Avg SRS 6.6 • Peak SRS 17.83 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.1

Open profile →

Mike DuBose

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4

Balanced

Avg SRS 7.2 • Peak SRS 17.64 seasons

Best finish #0 • Volatility 6.0

Open profile →

Herman Koehler

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3

Balanced

Avg SRS 7.1 • Peak SRS 18.24 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.0

Open profile →