Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Mike Sherman
Mike Sherman: 59th pct vs Paul Wiggin: 51st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mike ShermanPaul Wiggin
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Mike Sherman
Mike Sherman: 76th pct vs Paul Wiggin: 68th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Paul Wiggin
Paul Wiggin: 25th pct vs Mike Sherman: 21st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Mike Sherman vs Paul Wiggin
Mike Sherman: 0 titles vs Paul Wiggin: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Mike Sherman vs Paul Wiggin
Mike Sherman: 4 seasons vs Paul Wiggin: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Mike Sherman
Mike Sherman: 50.0% vs Paul Wiggin: 36.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Sherman has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeMike Sherman has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mike Sherman
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 9.6
84th pct
Strong
Paul Wiggin
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 5.3
73th pct
Strong
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mike ShermanPaul Wiggin
EliteStrongAverageLean
1980Actual season year • SRS range -8.5 to 16.02011
Active comparison point
Mike Sherman • 2011
2011 Texas A&M
Best seasonBiggest drop6-6 • SRS 16.0 • SP Overall 22.7
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+2.9
SP Off / Def
41.8 / 20.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Paul Wiggin
Nearest year 1983 • Stanford
1-10 • SRS -8.5 • SP Overall -12.6
Mike Sherman holds a 24.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +22.7 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Sherman | |||||
| Texas A&M | 2008-2011 | 4 | 25-25 | 6.5 | 16.0Highest peak |
| Paul Wiggin | |||||
| Stanford | 1980-1983 | 4 | 16-28 | 6.0 | 12.8 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Mike Sherman
25-25 • 50.0% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
16.0 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Texas A&M 2011
SRS 16.0
Worst Season
Texas A&M 2008
SRS -7.0
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 2009
11.0 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Paul Wiggin
16-28 • 36.4% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Stanford 1982
SRS 12.8
Worst Season
Stanford 1983
SRS -8.5
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 1982
5.4 SRS