2008-2011 • Texas A&M
One defining stop at Texas A&M.
Mike Sherman coached 4 seasons, won 50.0%, and posted an average SRS of 6.5. Best season: 2011 Texas A&M. The profile was offense-first with a highly volatile profile. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
25-25
Career Win %
50.0%
Seasons
4
Career Span
4 years
Average SRS
6.5
Peak SRS
16.0
Best Finish
#19
Consistency
21.0
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
6-6 • SRS 16.0 • SP Overall 22.7
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+2.9
SP Off / Def
41.8 / 20.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Texas A&M
2008-2011 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS 6.5 • Win % 50.0%
Longest Tenure
Texas A&M • 4 seasons
Best Tenure
Texas A&M • 6.5 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Texas A&M • 50.0%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Sherman sets the reference point in overall strength.
Mike Sherman sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mike Sherman
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 9.6
84th pct
Strong
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2008-2011 • 25-25
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.3 during vs 6.4 baseline
-0.1
Avg SRS
Higher is better
6.5 during vs 4.2 baseline
+2.3
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
9.6 during vs 8.1 baseline
+1.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
25.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+25.0%
High Points
Best Season
Texas A&M 2011
6-6 • SRS 16.0
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 2009
6-7 • 11.0 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Texas A&M 2011
6-6 • SP Off 41.8
Best Defensive Season
Texas A&M 2010
9-4 • SP Def 17.9
Setbacks
Worst Season
Texas A&M 2008
4-8 • SRS -7.0
Biggest Drop
Texas A&M 2011
6-6 • 2.9 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Texas A&M | 2011 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | #8 | — | 16.0 | 22.7 | 41.8 | 20.5 | +2.9 | -19.2% |
| Texas A&M | 2010 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #19 | 13.1 | 13.8 | 32.0 | 17.9 | +9.1 | +23.1% |
| Texas A&M | 2009 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.2% | — | — | 4.0 | 7.6 | 35.4 | 26.9 | +11.0 | +12.8% |
| Texas A&M | 2008 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -7.0 | -5.6 | 27.4 | 33.1 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS 6.0 • Peak SRS 12.8 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.6
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.5
Avg SRS 5.1 • Peak SRS 14.3 • 3 seasons
Best finish #10 • Volatility 6.9
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.9
Avg SRS 4.6 • Peak SRS 15.0 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.8
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 6.7 • Peak SRS 17.0 • 7 seasons
Best finish #8 • Volatility 6.4
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 6.7 • Peak SRS 16.1 • 7 seasons
Best finish #12 • Volatility 6.1
Open profile →same offense-first identity • volatility within 0.6
Avg SRS 9.6 • Peak SRS 18.1 • 6 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 8.4
Open profile →