2000-2021 • TCU
One defining stop at TCU.
Gary Patterson coached 22 seasons, won 69.6%, and posted an average SRS of 9.8. Best season: 2014 TCU. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. One primary stop defined the run.
Career Record
181-79
Career Win %
69.6%
Seasons
22
Career Span
22 years
Average SRS
9.8
Peak SRS
26.8
Best Finish
#2
Consistency
29.7
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
12-1 • SRS 26.8 • SP Overall 23.3
Win %
92.3%
YoY SRS
+21.0
SP Off / Def
39.3 / 17.5
Finish
#3
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
TCU
2000-2021 • 22 seasons
Avg SRS 9.8 • Win % 69.6%
Longest Tenure
TCU • 22 seasons
Best Tenure
TCU • 9.8 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
TCU • 69.6%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Gary Patterson sets the reference point in overall strength.
Gary Patterson sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gary Patterson
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 11.5
88th pct
Elite
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2000-2021 • 181-79
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.2 during vs 5.2 baseline
+3.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
9.8 during vs -5.6 baseline
+15.3
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
11.5 during vs -6.8 baseline
+18.3
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
54.5% during vs 0.0% baseline
+54.5%
High Points
Best Season
TCU 2014
12-1 • SRS 26.8
Biggest Improvement
TCU 2014
12-1 • 21.0 SRS
Best Offensive Season
TCU 2015
11-2 • SP Off 40.8
Best Defensive Season
TCU 2009
12-1 • SP Def 11.4
Setbacks
Worst Season
TCU 2004
5-6 • SRS -4.2
Biggest Drop
TCU 2001
6-6 • -15.6 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| TCU | 2021 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% | — | — | -2.8 | -0.6 | 33.2 | 33.9 | -10.5 | -22.5% |
| TCU | 2020 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% | — | — | 7.7 | 1.6 | 24.3 | 22.8 | -1.9 | +18.3% |
| TCU | 2019 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | 9.6 | 6.7 | 28.8 | 22.9 | +5.3 | -12.2% |
| TCU | 2018 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | #16 | — | 4.3 | 6.9 | 25.7 | 16.9 | -12.5 | -24.7% |
| TCU | 2017 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% | — | #9 | 16.8 | 18.9 | 35.7 | 18.7 | +12.5 | +32.4% |
| TCU | 2016 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.2% | #13 | — | 4.3 | 11.0 | 34.5 | 23.4 | -10.4 | -38.5% |
| TCU | 2015 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #2 | #7 | 14.7 | 19.0 | 40.8 | 21.7 | -12.1 | -7.7% |
| TCU | 2014 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% | — | #3 | 26.8 | 23.3 | 39.3 | 17.5 | +21.0 | +59.0% |
| TCU | 2013 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | #20 | — | 5.8 | 12.4 | 24.9 | 15.0 | -4.2 | -20.5% |
| TCU | 2012 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | #20 | — | 10.0 | 12.9 | 28.6 | 17.7 | -0.4 | -30.8% |
| TCU | 2011 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #14 | #14 | 10.4 | 15.7 | 37.7 | 23.3 | -12.2 | -15.4% |
| TCU | 2010 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | #6 | #2 | 22.6 | 25.2 | 39.4 | 15.8 | +0.2 | +7.7% |
| TCU | 2009 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% | #17 | #6 | 22.4 | 25.6 | 36.0 | 11.4 | +4.3 | +7.7% |
| TCU | 2008 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | — | #7 | 18.1 | 19.2 | 30.5 | 11.8 | +13.7 | +23.1% |
| TCU | 2007 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #22 | — | 4.4 | 6.4 | 24.4 | 19.0 | -7.0 | -23.1% |
| TCU | 2006 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #22 | #22 | 11.4 | 17.3 | 29.2 | 12.7 | -0.4 | -7.0% |
| TCU | 2005 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 91.7% | — | #11 | 11.8 | 10.5 | 28.3 | 17.7 | +16.0 | +46.2% |
| TCU | 2004 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -4.2 | -3.9 | 39.3 | 41.2 | -5.5 | -39.2% |
| TCU | 2003 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #25 | #25 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 31.4 | 30.5 | -3.9 | +1.3% |
| TCU | 2002 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | — | #23 | 5.2 | 7.5 | 32.4 | 27.0 | +5.8 | +33.3% |
| TCU | 2001 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -0.6 | 0.4 | 29.2 | 29.2 | -15.6 | +50.0% |
| TCU | 2000 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | #20 | #21 | 15.0 | 14.7 | 35.3 | 21.8 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 9.6 • Peak SRS 26.0 • 22 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 8.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.5
Avg SRS 8.3 • Peak SRS 26.4 • 16 seasons
Best finish #9 • Volatility 8.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 10.1 • Peak SRS 24.9 • 19 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 8.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS 10.3 • Peak SRS 22.0 • 23 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 9.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 23.1 • 17 seasons
Best finish #7 • Volatility 7.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.3
Avg SRS 8.4 • Peak SRS 32.3 • 19 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.4
Open profile →