2002-2023 • California, Fresno State
2 schools coached, anchored by California.
Jeff Tedford coached 16 seasons, won 61.7%, and posted an average SRS of 8.3. Best season: 2004 California. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 2 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Record
127-79
Career Win %
61.7%
Seasons
16
Career Span
22 years
Average SRS
8.3
Peak SRS
26.4
Best Finish
#9
Consistency
30.5
Higher = steadier
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-2 • SRS 26.4 • SP Overall 26.7
Win %
83.3%
YoY SRS
+13.8
SP Off / Def
43.6 / 19.2
Finish
#9
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop is sized by tenure length. Richer fill reflects a stronger average SRS at that school.
Fresno State
2017-2023 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS 2.1 • Win % 67.2%
California
2002-2012 • 11 seasons
Avg SRS 11.1 • Win % 59.0%
Longest Tenure
California • 11 seasons
Best Tenure
California • 11.1 SRS
Best Tenure Win %
Fresno State • 67.2%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jeff Tedford sets the reference point in overall strength.
Jeff Tedford sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jeff Tedford
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 11.1
87th pct
Elite
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
2017-2023 • 45-22
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
9.0 during vs 5.9 baseline
+3.1
Avg SRS
Higher is better
2.1 during vs -7.4 baseline
+9.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
3.3 during vs -3.0 baseline
+6.3
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
20.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+20.0%
2002-2012 • 82-57
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.5 during vs 3.2 baseline
+4.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
11.1 during vs -2.1 baseline
+13.2
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
14.6 during vs -1.4 baseline
+16.0
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
27.3% during vs 0.0% baseline
+27.3%
High Points
Best Season
California 2004
10-2 • SRS 26.4
Biggest Improvement
California 2004
10-2 • 13.8 SRS
Best Offensive Season
California 2004
10-2 • SP Off 43.6
Best Defensive Season
California 2008
9-4 • SP Def 14.3
Setbacks
Worst Season
Fresno State 2019
4-8 • SRS -4.6
Biggest Drop
Fresno State 2019
4-8 • -17.4 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Fresno State | 2023 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | -3.2 | 2.5 | 28.9 | 27.9 | -5.6 | -2.2% |
| Fresno State | 2022 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% | — | #24 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 27.1 | 24.4 | +7.0 | +38.1% |
| Fresno State | 2019 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -4.6 | -4.0 | 30.6 | 33.6 | -17.4 | -52.4% |
| Fresno State | 2018 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 85.7% | — | — | 12.8 | 17.4 | 33.5 | 15.5 | +9.5 | +14.3% |
| Fresno State | 2017 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% | — | — | 3.3 | -2.7 | 22.3 | 25.5 | +5.0 | +46.4% |
| California | 2012 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 25.0% | — | — | -1.7 | 5.3 | 31.3 | 25.8 | -7.9 | -28.8% |
| California | 2011 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 6.2 | 12.2 | 32.2 | 21.1 | -3.6 | +12.2% |
| California | 2010 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | 9.8 | 10.0 | 28.0 | 17.4 | +6.9 | -19.9% |
| California | 2009 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #12 | — | 2.9 | 6.5 | 30.2 | 22.5 | -9.7 | -7.7% |
| California | 2008 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 12.6 | 18.0 | 32.7 | 14.3 | +3.8 | +15.4% |
| California | 2007 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | #12 | — | 8.8 | 16.6 | 38.1 | 21.3 | -10.7 | -23.1% |
| California | 2006 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% | #9 | #14 | 19.5 | 17.6 | 35.7 | 19.9 | +7.5 | +10.3% |
| California | 2005 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | #19 | #25 | 12.0 | 18.4 | 35.8 | 17.5 | -14.4 | -16.7% |
| California | 2004 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | #12 | #9 | 26.4 | 26.7 | 43.6 | 19.2 | +13.8 | +26.2% |
| California | 2003 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% | — | — | 12.6 | 16.8 | 41.5 | 27.8 | +0.2 | -1.2% |
| California | 2002 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 12.4 | 12.6 | 42.7 | 33.0 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 8.4 • Peak SRS 32.3 • 19 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.4
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.5
Avg SRS 9.8 • Peak SRS 26.8 • 22 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 8.1
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 23.1 • 17 seasons
Best finish #7 • Volatility 7.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 23.6 • 19 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 8.1
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.3
Avg SRS 9.6 • Peak SRS 26.0 • 22 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 8.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS 8.8 • Peak SRS 21.7 • 18 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 8.0
Open profile →