Usage Score
29.2
Player Profile
Linell Bonner
WR • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Linell Bonner reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.8
Consistency
59
Season Value
65.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston
1314151516161717
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Primary stop by seasons
- Houston
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Linell Bonner, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston. Linell Bonner reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Houston paired 1,118 primary output with 74.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Houston
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
93.2
Efficiency
74.8
Usage
29.2
Consistency
59
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 42. Oklahoma: 63. Unknown: 46. Cincinnati: 119. Texas State: 52. UConn: 159. Navy: 117. Tulsa: 97. SMU: 24. Tulane: 97. Louisville: 67. Memphis: 235
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 5 by 56. Oklahoma: 4 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. Cincinnati: 8 by 99.2. Texas State: 6 by 57.8. UConn: 12 by 88.3. Navy: 9 by 86.7. Tulsa: 13 by 49.7. SMU: 4 by 40. Tulane: 9 by 71.9. Louisville: 8 by 55.8. Memphis: 17 by 92.2
Split Comparison
Wins93.4 · n=7 · -11.1 vs Losses
Losses104.5 · n=4 · +11.1 vs Wins
First Half80.2 · n=6 · -26 vs Second Half
Second Half106.2 · n=6 · +26 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ San Diego State | L 10-34 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 44-48 | — | 17 | 235 | 13 | 13.80 | 1 | 55 |
| Fri 11/18 | vs LouisvilleHigh volume | W 36-10 | — | 8 | 67 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs TulaneHigh volume | W 30-18 | — | 9 | 97 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ SMU | L 16-38 | — | 4 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs TulsaHigh volume | W 38-31 | — | 13 | 97 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | L 40-46 | — | 9 | 117 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 30 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs UConn100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-14 | — | 12 | 159 | 11.4 | 13.30 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Texas State | W 64-3 | — | 6 | 52 | 6.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 24 |
| Thu 9/15 | @ Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | W 40-16 | — | 8 | 119 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Oklahoma | W 33-23 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Houston | 317 | 77.4 | 13.5 | 317 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Houston | 317 | 77.4 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Houston | 1,118 | 74.8 | 29.2 | 801 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 1,118 | 74.8 | 29.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Houston | 889 | 69 | 32.4 | -229 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 889 | 69 | 32.4 | 0 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147
Primary metric
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
235
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
235 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
92
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 87.6 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
121
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Houston
1,118 primary output · 74.8 efficiency · 29.2 usage
65.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Houston
65.3
1,118 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 29.2 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Houston
60.6
889 primary · 69 efficiency · 32.4 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
11
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,324
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.