Usage Score
16.4
Player Profile
Michael Roberts
TE • 6'5" • Cleveland, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Michael Roberts reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.6
Consistency
71.9
Season Value
65.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Toledo
131415151616
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Toledo
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Toledo
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Michael Roberts, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Toledo. Michael Roberts reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Toledo paired 533 primary output with 74.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
41
Efficiency
74.6
Usage
16.4
Consistency
71.9
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 19. Arkansas State: 41. Unknown: 34. Fresno State: 48. BYU: 36. Eastern Michigan: 35. Bowling Green: 94. Central Michigan: 21. Ohio: 48. Akron: 54. Northern Illinois: 37. Ball State: 5. Western Michigan: 61
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 2 by 63.3. Arkansas State: 4 by 68.3. Unknown: 3 by 75.6. Fresno State: 3 by 100. BYU: 4 by 60. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 46.7. Bowling Green: 6 by 100. Central Michigan: 2 by 70. Ohio: 4 by 80. Akron: 4 by 90. Northern Illinois: 3 by 82.2. Ball State: 1 by 33.3. Western Michigan: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins41.9 · n=8 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses41 · n=4 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half43.9 · n=7 · +6.2 vs Second Half
Second Half37.7 · n=6 · -6.2 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs App State | L 28-31 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Western Michigan2+ TD | L 35-55 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 3 | 28 |
| Thu 11/17 | vs Ball State | W 37-19 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Thu 11/10 | @ Northern Illinois2+ TD | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 27 |
| Wed 11/2 | @ Akron | W 48-17 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Ohio | L 26-31 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Central Michigan | W 31-17 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Bowling Green2+ TD | W 42-35 | — | 6 | 94 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 3 | 41 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 35-20 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ BYU | L 53-55 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Fresno State2+ TD | W 52-17 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 2 | 33 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas State2+ TD | W 31-10 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 2 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 65 | 75 | 11.3 | 65 |
| 2015 Postseason | Toledo | 234 | 65.8 | 9.4 | 169 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 234 | 65.8 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Toledo | 533 | 74.6 | 16.4 | 299 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 533 | 74.6 | 16.4 | 0 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94
Primary metric
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
46
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Massachusetts
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Toledo
533 primary output · 74.6 efficiency · 16.4 usage
65.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Toledo
65.7
533 primary · 74.6 efficiency · 16.4 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Toledo
42.4
234 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 9.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.815
Benedictine · Cleveland, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
832
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.