Usage Score
4.8
Player Profile
Malik Foreman
DB • 5'10" • Kingsport, TN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Malik Foreman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.9
Consistency
61.7
Season Value
30.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Tennessee
131414151616
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Tennessee
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Tennessee
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Malik Foreman, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Tennessee. Malik Foreman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Tennessee paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 22.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Tennessee
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
22.9
Usage
4.8
Consistency
61.7
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 1. App State: 0.5. Virginia Tech: 0. Georgia: 1. Texas A&M: 2. Kentucky: 1. Missouri: 0. Vanderbilt: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 3 by 22.5. App State: 3 by 17.5. Virginia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Georgia: 4 by 26.7. Texas A&M: 3 by 32.5. Kentucky: 4 by 26.7. Missouri: 2 by 8.3. Vanderbilt: 5 by 40.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.6 · n=6 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses2 · n=2 · +1.4 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=4 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=4 · +0.6 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Nebraska | W 38-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | @ VanderbiltSplash game | L 34-45 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Missouri | W 63-37 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Kentucky | W 49-36 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Texas A&M | L 38-45 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Georgia | W 34-31 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Virginia Tech | W 45-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/1 | vs App State | W 20-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Tennessee | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Tennessee | 0 | 0 | — | -1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Tennessee | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tennessee | 7.5 | 22.9 | 4.8 | 6.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tennessee | 7.5 | 22.9 | 4.8 | 0 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Northwestern
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Vanderbilt
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#4
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.9 takeover score.
#5
Georgia
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 27.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Tennessee
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2014 Regular Season · Tennessee
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Tennessee
41.4
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8067
Casteel · Queen Creek, AZ
- Committed To
- Arizona
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
26
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.