Usage Score
12.1
Player Profile
Ja'Von Rolland-Jones
DE • 6'2" • 244 lbs • Mesquite, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ja'Von Rolland-Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 45.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
42.6
Consistency
48.7
Season Value
42.1
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
141516161717
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Arkansas State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Ja'Von Rolland-Jones, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arkansas State. Ja'Von Rolland-Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 45.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 33 primary output with 45.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 42.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.7
Efficiency
42.6
Usage
12.1
Consistency
48.7
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCF: 4. Toledo: 0. Auburn: 2. Utah State: 2. Unknown: 0. Georgia Southern: 1. South Alabama: 4. UL Monroe: 2.5. Georgia State: 1. New Mexico State: 7. Troy: 2. Louisiana: 5.5. Texas State: 3.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 4 by 56.7. Toledo: 5 by 20.8. Auburn: 3 by 32.5. Utah State: 3 by 32.5. Unknown: 0 by 0. Georgia Southern: 4 by 26.7. South Alabama: 6 by 65. UL Monroe: 2 by 33.3. Georgia State: 3 by 22.5. New Mexico State: 7 by 79.2. Troy: 3 by 32.5. Louisiana: 10 by 91.7. Texas State: 6 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins3.1 · n=8 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses2.4 · n=4 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half1.9 · n=7 · -1.7 vs Second Half
Second Half3.6 · n=6 · +1.7 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Louisiana
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ UCF2+ sacks · Splash game | W 31-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Texas StateSplash game | W 36-14 | 6 | 3 | — | 3 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Louisiana10+ tackles · 2+ sacks | L 19-24 | 10 | 2 | — | 3.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/18 | @ Troy | W 35-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs New Mexico State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 41-22 | 7 | 2 | — | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Georgia State | W 31-16 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs UL Monroe | W 51-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs South Alabama2+ sacks · Splash game | W 17-7 | 6 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/6 | vs Georgia Southern | W 27-26 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Utah State | L 20-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Auburn | L 14-51 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Toledo | L 10-31 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas State | 34.5 | 42.6 | 12.1 | 33.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 34.5 | 42.6 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Arkansas State | 33 | 45.7 | 14.8 | -1.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 33 | 45.7 | 14.8 | 0 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 67.8 takeover score.
#2
Texas State
5.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 65.3 takeover score.
#3
Louisiana
5.5
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 65 takeover score.
#4
Louisiana
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 63.9 takeover score.
#5
New Mexico State
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
33 primary output · 45.7 efficiency · 14.8 usage
46.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Arkansas State
46.2
33 primary · 45.7 efficiency · 14.8 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
42.1
34.5 primary · 42.6 efficiency · 12.1 usage
Milestones
6
Impact games
11
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.74
Mesquite · Mesquite, TX
- Committed To
- Arkansas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
112
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.