Usage Score
3
Player Profile
Chase Dahlquist
S • 6'0" • Tulsa, OK, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chase Dahlquist shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
9.5
Consistency
8.3
Season Value
9.8
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
1314151616
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- UTSA
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Chase Dahlquist, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA. Chase Dahlquist shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
UTSA paired 2 primary output with 9.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 9.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · UTSA
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
9.5
Usage
3
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 0. Colorado State: 0. Old Dominion: 1. Southern Miss: 0. Rice: 0. UTEP: 0. North Texas: 1. Charlotte: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 1 by 4.2. Colorado State: 1 by 4.2. Old Dominion: 4 by 26.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. Rice: 1 by 4.2. UTEP: 1 by 4.2. Charlotte: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.3 · n=4 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=4 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · n=4 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=4 · +0 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Best efficiency game
26.7 vs Old Dominion
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs New Mexico | L 20-23 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Charlotte | W 33-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs North Texas | W 31-17 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs UTEP | L 49-52 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Rice | W 14-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Southern Miss | W 55-32 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Old Dominion | L 19-33 | 4 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Colorado State | L 14-23 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 2 | 9.5 | 3 | 2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 2 | 9.5 | 3 | 0 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Old Dominion
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.3 takeover score.
#2
North Texas
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
#3
Southern Miss
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.1 takeover score.
#4
Charlotte
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.8 takeover score.
#5
New Mexico
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · UTSA
2 primary output · 9.5 efficiency · 3 usage
9.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
9.8
2 primary · 9.5 efficiency · 3 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7633
Union · Tulsa, OK
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
11
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.