Usage Score
14.8
Player Profile
Cameron Echols-Luper
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Ennis, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Cameron Echols-Luper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.2
Consistency
51
Season Value
55.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
13141415161617
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- TCU
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Cameron Echols-Luper, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Western Kentucky. Cameron Echols-Luper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Western Kentucky paired 473 primary output with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across TCU, Arkansas State, Western Kentucky.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
31.3
Efficiency
77.2
Usage
14.8
Consistency
51
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCF: 0. Toledo: 6. Auburn: 46. Utah State: 38. Unknown: 121. Georgia Southern: 0. South Alabama: 10. UL Monroe: 66. Georgia State: 0. New Mexico State: 31. Troy: 15. Louisiana: 35. Texas State: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 3 by 13.3. Auburn: 3 by 100. Utah State: 2 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. South Alabama: 1 by 66.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 100. New Mexico State: 2 by 100. Troy: 3 by 33.3. Louisiana: 4 by 58.3. Texas State: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins20.1 · n=8 · -11.1 vs Losses
Losses31.3 · n=4 · +11.1 vs Wins
First Half31.6 · n=7 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half31 · n=6 · -0.6 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ UCF | W 31-13 | — | — | — | -14 | — | — | — |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Texas State | W 36-14 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Louisiana | L 19-24 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/18 | @ Troy | W 35-3 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs New Mexico State | W 41-22 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Georgia State | W 31-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs UL Monroe | W 51-10 | — | 3 | 66 | 13.8 | 22 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs South Alabama | W 17-7 | — | 1 | 10 | 9.5 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Thu 10/6 | vs Georgia Southern | W 27-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 3 | 121 | 40.3 | 40.30 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Utah State | L 20-34 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Auburn | L 14-51 | — | 3 | 46 | 9.8 | 15.30 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Toledo | L 10-31 | — | 3 | 6 | 3.3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2013-2014
Opening stop
- 2
Arkansas State
2015-2016
Peak year stop
- 3
Western Kentucky
2017
Final stop
Season Progression
2013201420142015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | TCU | 21 | 35.5 | 8.2 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | TCU | 72 | 57.2 | 5.7 | 51 |
| 2014 Regular Season | TCU | 72 | 57.2 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | — | — | -72 |
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas State | 407 | 77.2 | 14.8 | 407 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 407 | 77.2 | 14.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 473 | 71.9 | 15.1 | 66 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
121
Primary metric
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida International
101
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 84.2 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
15
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
473 primary output · 71.9 efficiency · 15.1 usage
60.2
#2
2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
55.2
407 primary · 77.2 efficiency · 14.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Arkansas State
55.2
407 primary · 77.2 efficiency · 14.8 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.817
St. Vincent-St. Mary · Akron, OH
- Committed To
- Kent State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
973
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.