Usage Score
12.3
Player Profile
Nate Halverson
WR • 5'10" • Portland, OR, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Nate Halverson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
56
Consistency
33.9
Season Value
50.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · SMU
131415
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Primary stop by seasons
- SMU
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · SMU
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Nate Halverson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · SMU. Nate Halverson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
SMU paired 165 primary output with 56 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 56 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · SMU
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
23.6
Efficiency
56
Usage
12.3
Consistency
33.9
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 65. Texas A&M: 13. TCU: 4. East Carolina: 14. Cincinnati: 42. Memphis: 9. Tulsa: 18
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 4 by 100. Texas A&M: 3 by 28.9. TCU: 1 by 26.7. East Carolina: 2 by 46.7. Cincinnati: 4 by 70. Memphis: 1 by 60. Tulsa: 2 by 60
Split Comparison
Losses23.6 · n=7
First Half24 · n=4 · +1 vs Second Half
Second Half23 · n=3 · -1 vs First Half
All Games23.6 · n=7
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 165 | 56 | 12.3 | 165 |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | -165 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Cincinnati
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
East Carolina
14
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · SMU
165 primary output · 56 efficiency · 12.3 usage
50.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · SMU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · SMU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7859
Grant · Portland, OR
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
165
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.