Usage Score
6.5
Player Profile
Brandon Wilson
CB • 5'11" • Shreveport, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Brandon Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
29.9
Consistency
56.7
Season Value
24.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston
12131415151616
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Houston
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Brandon Wilson, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston. Brandon Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Houston paired 12 primary output with 29.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Houston
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
29.9
Usage
6.5
Consistency
56.7
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 0. Oklahoma: 2. Unknown: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Tulsa: 1. SMU: 2. UCF: 3. Tulane: 0. Louisville: 2. Memphis: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma: 10 by 61.7. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Cincinnati: 2 by 8.3. Tulsa: 5 by 30.8. SMU: 4 by 36.7. UCF: 3 by 42.5. Tulane: 6 by 25. Louisville: 5 by 40.8. Memphis: 5 by 40.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=6 · +0 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · n=3 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=5 · -1.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=5 · +1.2 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
61.7 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ San Diego State | L 10-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Memphis | L 44-48 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 11/18 | vs Louisville | W 36-10 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Tulane | W 30-18 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs UCFSplash game | W 31-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ SMU | L 16-38 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Tulsa | W 38-31 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 9/15 | @ Cincinnati | W 40-16 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Oklahoma10+ tackles | W 33-23 | 10 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Houston | 1 | 1.8 | — | 1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Houston | 1 | 1.8 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Houston | 12 | 29.9 | 6.5 | 11 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 12 | 29.9 | 6.5 | 0 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
UCF
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#4
SMU
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.9 takeover score.
#5
Louisville
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Houston
12 primary output · 29.9 efficiency · 6.5 usage
24.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Houston
24.7
12 primary · 29.9 efficiency · 6.5 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Houston
1.8
1 primary · 1.8 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
43
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.