Usage Score
16.8
Player Profile
Chance Allen
WR • 6'2" • Missouri City, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chance Allen reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.8
Consistency
75
Season Value
69.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Houston
121314151516
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Oregon
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Houston
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Chance Allen, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Houston. Chance Allen reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Houston paired 815 primary output with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oregon, Houston.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Houston
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
67.9
Efficiency
85.8
Usage
16.8
Consistency
75
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 5. Unknown: 30. Cincinnati: 94. Texas State: 52. UConn: 85. Navy: 87. Tulsa: 89. SMU: 84. UCF: 47. Tulane: 64. Louisville: 105. Memphis: 73
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 1 by 33.3. Unknown: 2 by 100. Cincinnati: 5 by 100. Texas State: 4 by 86.7. UConn: 7 by 81. Navy: 7 by 82.9. Tulsa: 7 by 84.8. SMU: 5 by 100. UCF: 3 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 100. Memphis: 8 by 60.8
Split Comparison
Wins67.6 · n=8 · -13.7 vs Losses
Losses81.3 · n=3 · +13.7 vs Wins
First Half58.8 · n=6 · -18.2 vs Second Half
Second Half77 · n=6 · +18.2 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ MemphisHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 44-48 | — | 8 | 73 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 2 | 35 |
| Fri 11/18 | vs Louisville100 receiving yards | W 36-10 | — | 4 | 105 | 26.3 | 26.30 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Tulane | W 30-18 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs UCF | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ SMU | L 16-38 | — | 5 | 84 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Tulsa | W 38-31 | — | 7 | 89 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Navy | L 40-46 | — | 7 | 87 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 1 | 25 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs UConn | W 42-14 | — | 7 | 85 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Texas State | W 64-3 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 23 |
| Thu 9/15 | @ Cincinnati | W 40-16 | — | 5 | 94 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Oklahoma | W 33-23 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2012-2014
Opening stop
- 2
Houston
2015-2016
Final stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Oregon | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Oregon | 98 | 93.3 | 6.9 | 98 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Oregon | 0 | — | — | -98 |
| 2015 Postseason | Houston | 752 | 80.8 | 20.4 | 752 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Houston | 752 | 80.8 | 20.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 815 | 85.8 | 16.8 | 63 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisville
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Vanderbilt
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Houston
815 primary output · 85.8 efficiency · 16.8 usage
69.2
#2
2015 Postseason · Houston
66.2
752 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 20.4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Houston
66.2
752 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 20.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8489
Elkins · Missouri City, TX
- Committed To
- Oregon
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,665
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.