Usage Score
13.7
Player Profile
Brandon Hawkins Jr.
WR • 5'10" • 190 lbs • Waxahachie, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Brandon Hawkins Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.2
Consistency
51.1
Season Value
57.6
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB
232425
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Primary stop by seasons
- UAB
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Brandon Hawkins Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB. Brandon Hawkins Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UAB paired 540 primary output with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UAB
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45
Efficiency
73.2
Usage
13.7
Consistency
51.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 41. Navy: 20. Akron: 59. Tennessee: 69. Army: 13. Florida Atlantic: 14. Memphis: 39. UConn: 89. Rice: 29. North Texas: 127. South Florida: 32. Tulsa: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. Navy: 3 by 44.4. Akron: 5 by 78.7. Tennessee: 7 by 65.7. Army: 2 by 43.3. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 31.1. Memphis: 4 by 65. UConn: 4 by 100. Rice: 2 by 96.7. North Texas: 6 by 100. South Florida: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins35.3 · n=3 · -13.8 vs Losses
Losses49.1 · n=8 · +13.8 vs Wins
First Half36 · n=6 · -18 vs Second Half
Second Half54 · n=6 · +18 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Tulsa | W 31-24 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs South Florida | L 18-48 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs North Texas100 receiving yards | L 24-53 | — | 6 | 127 | 21.2 | 21.20 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 17-24 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ UConn | L 19-38 | — | 4 | 89 | 24.2 | 22.30 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Memphis | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 39 | 8.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 33-53 | — | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Army | L 13-31 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Tennessee | L 24-56 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 30 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Akron | W 31-28 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Navy | L 24-38 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | UAB | 32 | 80 | 4.3 | 32 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UAB | 540 | 73.2 | 13.7 | 508 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127
Primary metric
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UConn
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
41
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Akron
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 78.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · UAB
540 primary output · 73.2 efficiency · 13.7 usage
57.6
#2
2024 Regular Season · UAB
36
32 primary · 80 efficiency · 4.3 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · UAB
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
572
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 15 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.