Usage Score
9.3
Player Profile
Taylor Cook
TE • 6'7" • Eagle Lake, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Taylor Cook reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
36.3
Season Value
38.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice
10111212
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Primary stop by seasons
- Rice
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Taylor Cook, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rice. Taylor Cook reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Rice paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Rice
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
11.2
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
9.3
Consistency
36.3
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 0. UCLA: 10. Kansas: 15. Louisiana Tech: 0. Marshall: 0. Houston: 21. Memphis: 0. UTSA: 7. Southern Miss: 8. Tulane: 53. SMU: 20. UTEP: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 1 by 66.7. Kansas: 1 by 100. Houston: 2 by 70. UTSA: 1 by 46.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 53.3. Tulane: 3 by 100. SMU: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins14.7 · n=7 · +8.5 vs Losses
Losses6.2 · n=5 · -8.5 vs Wins
First Half7.7 · n=6 · -7.0 vs Second Half
Second Half14.7 · n=6 · +7.0 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | @ Air Force | W 33-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | @ UTEP | W 33-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs SMU | W 36-14 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Tulane | W 49-47 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Southern Miss | W 44-17 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs UTSA | W 34-14 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Memphis | L 10-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Houston | L 14-35 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Marshall | L 51-54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 37-56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Kansas | W 25-24 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 8/30 | vs UCLA | L 24-49 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rice | 133 | 61.1 | 7.3 | 133 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rice | 134 | 76.7 | 9.3 | 1 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 134 | 76.7 | 9.3 | 0 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53
Primary metric
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Baylor
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Rice
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2012 Postseason · Rice
38.2
134 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Rice
38.2
134 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 9.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
267
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.