Usage Score
16.3
Player Profile
Nick Adams
WR • 6'2" • Walterboro, SC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Nick Adams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.5
Consistency
61
Season Value
63.8
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UAB
09101112
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Primary stop by seasons
- UAB
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UAB
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Nick Adams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UAB. Nick Adams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UAB paired 656 primary output with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · UAB
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
54.7
Efficiency
78.5
Usage
16.3
Consistency
61
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 7. South Carolina: 21. Ohio State: 45. Tulsa: 71. Unknown: 68. Houston: 55. East Carolina: 114. Tulane: 119. Southern Miss: 35. Marshall: 47. Memphis: 42. UCF: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 2 by 23.3. South Carolina: 2 by 70. Ohio State: 5 by 60. Tulsa: 4 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 100. Houston: 6 by 61.1. East Carolina: 4 by 100. Tulane: 5 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 100. Marshall: 3 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 56. UCF: 3 by 71.1
Split Comparison
Wins41 · n=2 · -15.2 vs Losses
Losses56.2 · n=9 · +15.2 vs Wins
First Half44.5 · n=6 · -20.3 vs Second Half
Second Half64.8 · n=6 · +20.3 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Marshall
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ UCF | L 24-49 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Memphis | L 9-46 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Marshall | W 38-31 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Southern Miss | W 27-19 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Tulane100 receiving yards | L 45-55 | — | 5 | 119 | 23.8 | 23.80 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards | L 35-42 | — | 4 | 114 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 0 | 66 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Houston | L 17-39 | — | 6 | 55 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Tulsa | L 42-49 | — | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Ohio State | L 15-29 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ South Carolina | L 6-49 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Troy | L 29-39 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 277 | 70.9 | 12.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | -277 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UAB | 390 | 88.6 | 11.6 | 390 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UAB | 656 | 78.5 | 16.3 | 266 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119
Primary metric
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Troy
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · UAB
656 primary output · 78.5 efficiency · 16.3 usage
63.8
#2
2011 Regular Season · UAB
58.6
390 primary · 88.6 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · UAB
44.9
277 primary · 70.9 efficiency · 12.9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7444
Colleton County · Walterboro, SC
- Committed To
- East Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,323
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.