Usage Score
14.6
Player Profile
RB • 5'11" • Waggaman, LA, USA
Payten Jason leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.1 efficiency.
Usage Score
14.6
Efficiency
45.1
Consistency
69.3
Season Value
57
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Tulane
Quick Facts
Payten Jason, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Tulane. Payten Jason leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.1 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Tulane paired 296 primary output with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with 60 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Scrimmage Yards / G
32.9
Efficiency
45.1
Usage
14.6
Consistency
69.3
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 20. Houston: 30. Rutgers: 35. Army: 49. Tulsa: 29. SMU: 60. Southern Miss: 16. Rice: 50. Marshall: 7
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 8 by 22.9. Houston: 6 by 52.1. Rutgers: 16 by 20.8. Army: 11 by 42.3. Tulsa: 6 by 50.3. SMU: 14 by 44.6. Southern Miss: 4 by 41.7. Rice: 4 by 72.9. Marshall: 1 by 58.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
72.9 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Marshall | L 23-38 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Rice | W 54-49 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 0 | 1 | 39 | 12.5 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Southern Miss | L 30-46 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs SMU | L 17-31 | 14 | 60 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Tulsa | L 24-52 | 6 | 29 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Army | L 23-41 | 10 | 38 | 3.80 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4.5 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Rutgers | W 17-14 | 15 | 28 | 1.90 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2.2 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Houston | L 23-42 | 6 | 30 | 5 | 1 | — | — | 5 |
| Sun 9/12 | vs Ole Miss | L 13-27 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 2.5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 121 | 46.4 | 9.7 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 296 | 45.1 | 14.6 | 175 |
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Loss with 73 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
73
Primary metric
73 scrimmage yards and 22.6 usage.
#2
SMU
60
Primary metric
Loss with 60 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
60 scrimmage yards and 21.9 usage.
#3
Rice
50
Primary metric
Win with 50 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
50 scrimmage yards and 6.6 usage.
#4
Army
49
Primary metric
Loss with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
49 scrimmage yards and 23.9 usage.
#5
Army
12
Primary metric
Win with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12 scrimmage yards and 2.3 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Tulane
296 primary output · 45.1 efficiency · 14.6 usage
57
#2
2009 Regular Season · Tulane
31.6
121 primary · 46.4 efficiency · 9.7 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8256
Jesuit · New Orleans, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
417
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Payten Jason quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit