Usage Score
16.1
Player Profile
Isaiah Epps
WR • 6'2" • 190 lbs • Jenks, OK, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Isaiah Epps reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.9
Consistency
62.1
Season Value
61.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
1617181920202122
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Primary stop by seasons
- Kentucky
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Isaiah Epps, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Tulsa. Isaiah Epps reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 429 primary output with 70.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, Tulsa.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
35.8
Efficiency
70.9
Usage
16.1
Consistency
62.1
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 79. Northern Illinois: 39. Unknown: 37. Ole Miss: 62. Cincinnati: 51. Navy: 37. Temple: 20. SMU: 10. Tulane: 23. Memphis: 23. South Florida: 27. Houston: 21
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 4 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 86.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 5 by 68. Navy: 4 by 61.7. Temple: 2 by 66.7. SMU: 2 by 33.3. Tulane: 2 by 76.7. Memphis: 3 by 51.1. South Florida: 3 by 60. Houston: 3 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Wins26.8 · n=4 · -14.0 vs Losses
Losses40.7 · n=7 · +14.0 vs Wins
First Half50.8 · n=6 · +30.2 vs Second Half
Second Half20.7 · n=6 · -30.2 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Houston | W 37-30 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs South Florida | W 48-42 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Memphis | L 10-26 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Tulane | L 13-27 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs SMU | L 34-45 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| Fri 10/21 | @ Temple | W 27-16 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Navy | L 21-53 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Cincinnati | L 21-31 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Ole Miss2+ TD | L 27-35 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Northern Illinois | W 38-35 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Wyoming | L 37-40 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 54 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kentucky
2016-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Tulsa
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192020202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Kentucky | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kentucky | 55 | 80 | 8.2 | 55 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kentucky | 76 | 60.7 | 11 | 21 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Kentucky | 0 | — | — | -76 |
| 2020 Postseason | Kentucky | 63 | 52.8 | 15.8 | 63 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Kentucky | 63 | 52.8 | 15.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Kentucky | 171 | 80.7 | 10 | 108 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulsa | 429 | 70.9 | 16.1 | 258 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83
Primary metric
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wyoming
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ole Miss
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
Ole Miss
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
429 primary output · 70.9 efficiency · 16.1 usage
61.9
#2
2021 Regular Season · Kentucky
44.6
171 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Kentucky
42.6
55 primary · 80 efficiency · 8.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8728
Sequoyah · Canton, GA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
794
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.