Usage Score
10
Player Profile
WR • 6'0" • 170 lbs • Tyler, TX, USA
Bryson Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10
Efficiency
39
Consistency
29.3
Season Value
23.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Houston
Quick Facts
Bryson Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Houston. Bryson Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Houston paired 173 primary output with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 39 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
6.9
Efficiency
39
Usage
10
Consistency
29.3
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. Unknown: 8. Washington State: 24. Tulane: 6. North Texas: 3. Cincinnati: 2. UConn: 1. SMU: 0. Memphis: 18
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 53.3. Washington State: 2 by 80. Tulane: 1 by 40. North Texas: 1 by 20. Cincinnati: 1 by 13.3. UConn: 1 by 6.7. Memphis: 2 by 60
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
80 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/16 | vs Memphis | L 27-45 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 10/24 | vs SMU | L 31-34 | — | — | — | -2.3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ UConn | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Cincinnati | L 23-38 | — | 1 | 2 | 4.8 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ North Texas | W 46-25 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Fri 9/20 | @ Tulane | L 31-38 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Washington State | L 24-31 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 9/1 | @ Oklahoma | L 31-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Houston | 285 | 58.1 | 13.5 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Houston | 285 | 58.1 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Houston | 62 | 39 | 10 | -223 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Houston | 173 | 73.8 | 12.5 | 111 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | -173 |
#1 Featured game
Temple
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117
Primary metric
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Washington State
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#5
Cincinnati
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Houston
173 primary output · 73.8 efficiency · 12.5 usage
48.4
#2
2018 Postseason · Houston
46.9
285 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 13.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Houston
46.9
285 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 13.5 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
520
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Bryson Smith quick answers