Usage Score
0.3
Player Profile
WR • 6'3" • 225 lbs • Waco, TX, USA
Sam Glaesmann reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
0.3
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
50.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice
Quick Facts
Sam Glaesmann, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice. Sam Glaesmann reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rice paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
0.3
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 0. UTEP: 0. Houston: 0. UTSA: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. UAB: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
— vs UAB
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2015-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | 0.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0
Primary metric
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Houston
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
UTEP
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Rice
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0.3 usage
50.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · Rice
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Rice
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
0
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Sam Glaesmann quick answers