Usage Score
15.3
Player Profile
Justin McInnis
WR • 6'6" • 210 lbs • Pierrefonds, QC, Canada
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Justin McInnis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.9
Consistency
57.4
Season Value
64.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
15161617171818
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Arkansas State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Justin McInnis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arkansas State. Justin McInnis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 800 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
66.7
Efficiency
83.9
Usage
15.3
Consistency
57.4
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 107. Nebraska: 22. Unknown: 84. SMU: 22. Georgia Southern: 8. Coastal Carolina: 63. Louisiana: 61. New Mexico State: 68. South Alabama: 30. Texas State: 33. UL Monroe: 211. Troy: 91
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 100. Nebraska: 3 by 48.9. Unknown: 2 by 100. SMU: 2 by 73.3. Georgia Southern: 1 by 53.3. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 100. Louisiana: 4 by 100. New Mexico State: 7 by 64.8. South Alabama: 3 by 66.7. Texas State: 1 by 100. UL Monroe: 9 by 100. Troy: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins74 · n=6 · +19.6 vs Losses
Losses54.4 · n=5 · -19.6 vs Wins
First Half51 · n=6 · -31.3 vs Second Half
Second Half82.3 · n=6 · +31.3 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Best efficiency game
100 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/17 | vs Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards | L 30-35 | — | 7 | 107 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 12/3 | vs Troy | L 25-32 | — | 6 | 91 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ UL Monroe100 receiving yards · High volume | W 67-50 | — | 9 | 211 | 23.4 | 23.40 | 0 | 71 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Texas State | W 30-12 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ South Alabama | L 19-24 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 10/29 | @ New Mexico State | W 37-21 | — | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 10/19 | vs Louisiana2+ TD | W 47-3 | — | 4 | 61 | 12.8 | 15.30 | 2 | 44 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 51-17 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 32 |
| Thu 10/5 | @ Georgia Southern | W 43-25 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ SMU | L 21-44 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 84 | 42 | 42 | 1 | 73 |
| Sun 9/3 | @ Nebraska | L 36-43 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas State | 83 | 50.4 | 8.6 | 83 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 83 | 50.4 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Arkansas State | 800 | 83.9 | 15.3 | 717 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 800 | 83.9 | 15.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Arkansas State | 748 | 75.5 | 19.8 | -52 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 748 | 75.5 | 19.8 | 0 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
211
Primary metric
211 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Alabama
177
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
177 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia State
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
800 primary output · 83.9 efficiency · 15.3 usage
64.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Arkansas State
64.2
800 primary · 83.9 efficiency · 15.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Arkansas State
63.1
748 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 19.8 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,631
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.