Usage Score
14
Player Profile
TE • 6'4" • Wando, SC, USA
Brandon Ford reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14
Efficiency
72.3
Consistency
60.8
Season Value
61.8
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Clemson
Quick Facts
Brandon Ford, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Clemson. Brandon Ford reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Clemson paired 480 primary output with 72.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: NC State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
43.6
Efficiency
72.3
Usage
14
Consistency
60.8
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 69. Auburn: 51. Ball State: 25. Unknown: 30. Florida State: 69. Boston College: 38. Georgia Tech: 21. Wake Forest: 17. Maryland: 46. NC State: 101. South Carolina: 13
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 9 by 51.1. Auburn: 5 by 68. Ball State: 3 by 55.6. Unknown: 1 by 100. Florida State: 4 by 100. Boston College: 5 by 50.7. Georgia Tech: 2 by 70. Wake Forest: 2 by 56.7. Maryland: 2 by 100. NC State: 5 by 100. South Carolina: 2 by 43.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
NC State
Best efficiency game
100 vs NC State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs LSUHigh volume | W 25-24 | — | 9 | 69 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 11/25 | vs South Carolina | L 17-27 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs NC State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 62-48 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 2 | 69 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Maryland | W 45-10 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 24 |
| Thu 10/25 | @ Wake Forest | W 42-13 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Georgia Tech | W 47-31 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Boston College | W 45-31 | — | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ Florida State2+ TD | L 37-49 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Ball State | W 52-27 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Auburn | W 26-19 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 22 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Clemson | 4 | 26.7 | 7.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Clemson | 78 | 41.4 | 7.8 | 74 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Clemson | 78 | 41.4 | 7.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Clemson | 166 | 58.1 | 8.3 | 88 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Clemson | 166 | 58.1 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Clemson | 480 | 72.3 | 14 | 314 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Clemson | 480 | 72.3 | 14 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
NC State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77
Primary metric
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
NC State
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 75 efficiency score.
#4
Florida State
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Clemson
480 primary output · 72.3 efficiency · 14 usage
61.8
#2
2012 Regular Season · Clemson
61.8
480 primary · 72.3 efficiency · 14 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Clemson
33.8
4 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 7.7 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8733
Hanahan · North Charleston, SC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
728
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Brandon Ford quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit