Usage Score
17.5
Player Profile
Blake Mack
TE • 6'3" • 245 lbs • Lonoke, AR, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Blake Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
97.1
Consistency
60.3
Season Value
68.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
14141516161717
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Arkansas State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Blake Mack, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Arkansas State. Blake Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 652 primary output with 97.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 97.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
59.3
Efficiency
97.1
Usage
17.5
Consistency
60.3
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCF: 67. Toledo: 87. Auburn: 49. Utah State: 82. Unknown: 142. Georgia Southern: 29. South Alabama: 39. UL Monroe: 48. New Mexico State: 46. Louisiana: 28. Texas State: 35
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 1 by 100. Toledo: 2 by 100. Auburn: 3 by 100. Utah State: 7 by 78.1. Unknown: 8 by 100. Georgia Southern: 2 by 96.7. South Alabama: 2 by 100. UL Monroe: 3 by 100. New Mexico State: 2 by 100. Louisiana: 2 by 93.3. Texas State: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins44 · n=6 · -17.5 vs Losses
Losses61.5 · n=4 · +17.5 vs Wins
First Half76 · n=6 · +36.8 vs Second Half
Second Half39.2 · n=5 · -36.8 vs First Half
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ UCF | W 31-13 | — | 1 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 0 | 67 |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Texas State | W 36-14 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Louisiana | L 19-24 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs New Mexico State | W 41-22 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs UL Monroe | W 51-10 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs South Alabama | W 17-7 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Thu 10/6 | vs Georgia Southern | W 27-26 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 142 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Utah State | L 20-34 | — | 7 | 82 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Auburn | L 14-51 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Toledo | L 10-31 | — | 2 | 87 | 43.5 | 43.50 | 0 | 83 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Arkansas State | 149 | 83.3 | 6.9 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 149 | 83.3 | 6.9 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 86 | 62.5 | 9.4 | -63 |
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas State | 652 | 97.1 | 17.5 | 566 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 652 | 97.1 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Arkansas State | 618 | 71.8 | 16.2 | -34 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 618 | 71.8 | 16.2 | 0 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
142
Primary metric
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Troy
104
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas State
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
652 primary output · 97.1 efficiency · 17.5 usage
68.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Arkansas State
68.7
652 primary · 97.1 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
63.1
618 primary · 71.8 efficiency · 16.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7959
Lonoke · Lonoke, AR
- Committed To
- Arkansas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,505
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.