Usage Score
—
Player Profile
S • 5'10" • Orange, TX, USA
Earl Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20 disruption score.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
20
Consistency
79.2
Season Value
66.4
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Texas
Quick Facts
Earl Thomas, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Texas. Earl Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Texas paired 8 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
1
Efficiency
20
Usage
—
Consistency
79.2
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UL Monroe: 0. Texas Tech: 1. UTEP: 2. Colorado: 1. Oklahoma: 1. Oklahoma State: 1. Kansas: 1. Texas A&M: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
40 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | @ Texas A&M | W 49-39 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Kansas | W 51-20 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Oklahoma State | W 41-14 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Oklahoma | W 16-13 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Colorado | W 38-14 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | vs UTEPSplash game | W 64-7 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Texas Tech | W 34-24 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/5 | vs UL Monroe | W 59-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Texas | 2 | 20 | — | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas | 8 | 20 | — | 6 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
UTEP
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#3
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
#4
Kansas
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
#5
Oklahoma State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Texas
8 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
66.4
#2
2008 Regular Season · Texas
45.6
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.79
Petal · Petal, MS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Earl Thomas quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit