Usage Score
5.3
Player Profile
Nick Rieke
TE • 6'4" • Crystal Lake, IL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Nick Rieke reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
37.3
Consistency
58.4
Season Value
49.6
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Bowling Green
0910
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Primary stop by seasons
- Bowling Green
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Bowling Green
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Nick Rieke, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Nick Rieke reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 23 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 37.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
7.4
Efficiency
37.3
Usage
5.3
Consistency
58.4
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 18. Marshall: 5. Michigan: 7. Kent State: 0. Western Michigan: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 2 by 60. Marshall: 1 by 33.3. Michigan: 1 by 46.7. Kent State: 1 by 0. Western Michigan: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Losses8 · n=4
First Half10 · n=3 · +6.5 vs Second Half
Second Half3.5 · n=2 · -6.5 vs First Half
All Games7.4 · n=5
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
60 vs Tulsa
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 23 | 76.7 | 3.4 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 37 | 37.3 | 5.3 | 14 |
AdvertisementIn-Content Responsive
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12
Primary metric
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Bowling Green
23 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 3.4 usage
59.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
49.6
37 primary · 37.3 efficiency · 5.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7667
Crystal Lake South · Crystal Lake, IL
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
60
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.