Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Mike Kruczek
Mike Kruczek: 44th pct vs George MacIntyre: 37th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
George MacIntyreMike Kruczek
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: George MacIntyre
George MacIntyre: 58th pct vs Mike Kruczek: 52nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: George MacIntyre vs Mike Kruczek
George MacIntyre: 37th pct vs Mike Kruczek: 34th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: George MacIntyre vs Mike Kruczek
George MacIntyre: 0 titles vs Mike Kruczek: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: George MacIntyre vs Mike Kruczek
George MacIntyre: 7 seasons vs Mike Kruczek: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Mike Kruczek
Mike Kruczek: 54.5% vs George MacIntyre: 32.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Kruczek has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeMike Kruczek has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
George MacIntyre
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -4.8
42th pct
Mixed
Mike Kruczek
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -2.9
47th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
George MacIntyreMike Kruczek
EliteStrongAverageLean
1979Actual season year • SRS range -17.2 to 8.72003
Active comparison point
George MacIntyre • 1982
1982 Vanderbilt
Best season8-4 • SRS 8.7 • SP Overall 7.5
Win %
66.7%
YoY SRS
+8.1
SP Off / Def
30.1 / 24.3
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mike Kruczek
Nearest year 1998 • UCF
9-2 • SRS 6.4 • SP Overall 10.2
George MacIntyre holds a 2.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -6.5 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George MacIntyre | |||||
| Vanderbilt | 1979-1985 | 7 | 25-52-1 | -2.1 | 8.7Highest peak |
| Mike Kruczek | |||||
| UCF | 1998-2003 | 6 | 36-30 | -2.9 | 6.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →George MacIntyre
25-52-1 • 32.7% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
8.7 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Vanderbilt 1982
SRS 8.7
Worst Season
Vanderbilt 1979
SRS -12.7
Biggest Improvement
Vanderbilt 1981
10.1 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Mike Kruczek
36-30 • 54.5% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
44th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
UCF 1998
SRS 6.4
Worst Season
UCF 2003
SRS -17.2
Biggest Improvement
UCF 2000
5.8 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.