Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Bill Hess vs Chuck Stobart
Bill Hess: 39th pct vs Chuck Stobart: 38th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Bill Hess vs Chuck Stobart
Bill Hess: 39th pct vs Chuck Stobart: 38th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Stobart vs Bill Hess
Chuck Stobart: 56th pct vs Bill Hess: 56th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Stobart vs Bill Hess
Chuck Stobart: 24th pct vs Bill Hess: 22nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bill Hess vs Chuck Stobart
Bill Hess: 0 titles vs Chuck Stobart: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Chuck Stobart
Chuck Stobart: 18 seasons vs Bill Hess: 16 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Bill Hess
Bill Hess: 49.1% vs Chuck Stobart: 45.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Bill Hess has the edge in overall strength.
Bill Hess has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Chuck Stobart
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -1.3
52th pct
Mixed
Bill Hess
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 0.1
57th pct
Above average
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
6-5 • SRS 7.9 • SP Overall 9.8
Win %
54.5%
YoY SRS
+7.7
SP Off / Def
31.4 / 23.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Bill Hess
Nearest year 1977 • Ohio
1-10 • SRS -18.6 • SP Overall -18.8
Chuck Stobart holds a 26.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +6.3 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Stobart | |||||
| Toledo | 1977-1981 | 5 | 24-31-1 | -11.4 | -0.9 |
| Utah | 1982-1984 | 3 | 16-17-1 | 2.1Best quality | 4.1 |
| Memphis | 1989-1994 | 6 | 29-36-1 | -1.3 | 7.9 |
| Bill Hess | |||||
| Ohio | 1962-1977 | 16 | 80-83-3 | -5.3 | 7.8Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
69-84-3 • 45.2% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
3 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Memphis 1992
SRS 7.9
Worst Season
Toledo 1977
SRS -21.8
Biggest Improvement
Toledo 1979
19.0 SRS
80-83-3 • 49.1% • 16 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Ohio 1962
SRS 7.8
Worst Season
Ohio 1965
SRS -21.7
Biggest Improvement
Ohio 1973
16.1 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.